gator_hater
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Posts
- 304
When Skywest loses flying they have been keeping aircraft and performing "at risk" flying. I guess it's easier to just turn our planes in or hand them over to another carrier. I'd like to hear management's plan for the future Super Regional, does keeping labor numbers thin and performance down achieve success?
If it were only that simple. The geography of the western US makes their at risk more feasible than ours would be. Places like Elko, Nv will probably generate enough demand to remain at least a little bit profitable since they are so far from alternative airports. On the other hand people in Albany and Valdosta will just drive to TLH when Delta pulls out and puts a mad dog in to replace our 700. The cities that might generate enough revenue to support at risk flights, Brunswick and Ashville, delta would never give up. Eventually skyw will run out of at risk cities.
Last edited: