DornierPilot
Doing my part...
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2002
- Posts
- 74
A-380 rates
I'm looking forward to the road show presentations. I'm sure that most of my questions will be answered such that I'll be able to make a much more informed decision than I would be able to at the moment.
I was suprised to see how little difference there was from wide body to A-380. I mean, the company will be generating double the revenue per leg of an MD-11 flight. I wasn't expecting double the pay rate, but you have to admit that the hourly crew costs (even with double augmentation) for the A-380 will amount to a grain of sand in a very large hourglass!
Re: my vote. My Negotiating Committee speaks for my and if there is a unanimous vote from the committee and the MEC, that is a really strong indication for a yes vote. (After the road show presentation, I'll be able to determine if it is really just a huge conspiracy by the NC/MEC to trick us into accepting a subpar agreement!)
IMHO, the reason we have crewmember ratification is so that if a TA was presented that did not have unanimous support of the NC and/or the MEC, the crewmembers would have the final say so.
I think it will be pretty hard to justify not supporting a 100% buy-in from the members closest involved for the last 2-1/2 years.
Of course, I could be drowning in ALPA koolaide - time will tell.
A side note: I did think it significant that the UPS agreement passed by 56%. I have to think that UPS management toasted that result - only missing their target of 51% by 5% would have to be considered a success in most peoples' minds. Let's hope the UPS pilots are not split from this vote and that their agreement is much better than the final vote of support indicated!!!
I'm looking forward to the road show presentations. I'm sure that most of my questions will be answered such that I'll be able to make a much more informed decision than I would be able to at the moment.
I was suprised to see how little difference there was from wide body to A-380. I mean, the company will be generating double the revenue per leg of an MD-11 flight. I wasn't expecting double the pay rate, but you have to admit that the hourly crew costs (even with double augmentation) for the A-380 will amount to a grain of sand in a very large hourglass!
Re: my vote. My Negotiating Committee speaks for my and if there is a unanimous vote from the committee and the MEC, that is a really strong indication for a yes vote. (After the road show presentation, I'll be able to determine if it is really just a huge conspiracy by the NC/MEC to trick us into accepting a subpar agreement!)
IMHO, the reason we have crewmember ratification is so that if a TA was presented that did not have unanimous support of the NC and/or the MEC, the crewmembers would have the final say so.
I think it will be pretty hard to justify not supporting a 100% buy-in from the members closest involved for the last 2-1/2 years.
Of course, I could be drowning in ALPA koolaide - time will tell.
A side note: I did think it significant that the UPS agreement passed by 56%. I have to think that UPS management toasted that result - only missing their target of 51% by 5% would have to be considered a success in most peoples' minds. Let's hope the UPS pilots are not split from this vote and that their agreement is much better than the final vote of support indicated!!!