The reason we lost 2000 pilots is because they were forced to either take the lump sum, or risk losing it all. Many had a choice between staying at an airline they had worked for for 25 plus years, or leaving with a nice chunk of change, and maybe nothing else. That is why 2000 left. We kept most of our work rules, which NWA would gain back if we merged, since they gave their's away. Have you even looked at the comparison? Doubt it. Do you see the double standard here?Why Yes....Yes I do. Your pension experts explain that everyone will be better off than before, retirement wise, yet you want credit for a lost pension. We kept our rules and lost the pension. NWA kept their pension, and lost their work rules. So, if we merge, they get the rules back, yet keep their pensions.How about all the NWA pilots whose frozen pensions are the same as or less than DAL pilots PBGC guarantee? We don't. If you don't yet understand the inequity, then you probably never will. How about if we do merge, someone in management THREATENS to take away NWA's pensions. Threaten all they want. Would have to be in BK or fully funded to terminate(federal law) What would happen? They would lose maybe 2000 of their pilots, Why?and then we would be equal in age. A win-win, right? Do you need a "heading" to understand this?
Bye Bye--General Lee