A Squared
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 3,006
>>>>>You might have read my post, but you surely do not understand it.
Yes, I understand it completely and thouroughly, I have a full understanding of the rationalization you are attempting.
>>>>>>>>If 'company Y' as we have referred to it, have PERMANENT positions for CAPTAINS, and no PERMANENT f/o positions then utilise f/o's that are doing the hourbuilding courses...then whose job is there to be taken??????????????NOBODY'S There are, in a situation like this, NO F/O POSITIONS FOR PERMANENT CREW. Do you get it now?
I have "got it" right from the start. If Company Y has 5 1900's and 10 crews, that's 10 FO positions which you and your ilk are making unavailable by agreeing to pay to sit in those seats.
>>>Believe it or not, there is a difference in the above two examples.
No, really there isn't. By agreeing to fly for free, you make a paying job disappear, it is really irrelevant whether it was previously held by a paid pilot or an paying pilot.
regards
Yes, I understand it completely and thouroughly, I have a full understanding of the rationalization you are attempting.
>>>>>>>>If 'company Y' as we have referred to it, have PERMANENT positions for CAPTAINS, and no PERMANENT f/o positions then utilise f/o's that are doing the hourbuilding courses...then whose job is there to be taken??????????????NOBODY'S There are, in a situation like this, NO F/O POSITIONS FOR PERMANENT CREW. Do you get it now?
I have "got it" right from the start. If Company Y has 5 1900's and 10 crews, that's 10 FO positions which you and your ilk are making unavailable by agreeing to pay to sit in those seats.
>>>Believe it or not, there is a difference in the above two examples.
No, really there isn't. By agreeing to fly for free, you make a paying job disappear, it is really irrelevant whether it was previously held by a paid pilot or an paying pilot.
regards