Former Tranny bidding SW Captain prior to 2015?

[PCL_128]

Ignore or not. You said there is case law covering this. Post it. If you cannot post it then it is proof you are all talk. Apparently not even PCL can help you on this one.

Personally, I'm not aware of the case law. But I'm also not an attorney, I don't play one on TV, and I haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn Express in quite some time. So I would suggest that you talk to an attorney if you want to get information on case law.

 

[Cometman]

Personally, I'm not aware of the case law. But I'm also not an attorney, I don't play one on TV, and I haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn Express in quite some time. So I would suggest that you talk to an attorney if you want to get information on case law.

Thanks for the honest response. Your friend Lear stated that there is case law but he will not post it. If he is aware of it then there would not be any reason not to post it. After all he was the one that said there is case law to cover this exact case. If you cannot back up your statements then don't say it. I am sure there are a lot of pilots that would be interested in reading the case law.

 

[PCL_128]

It's possible that he's received some sort of briefing on it that he can't discuss. Maybe there is a strategic element to not releasing the specifics. I really don't know. You'd have to ask him, but since you're such a d0uche, you can't, because he's got you on ignore.

 

[SWA717]

Lol!!!!

 

[CaptWidgeon]

It's possible that he's received some sort of briefing on it that he can't discuss. Maybe there is a strategic element to not releasing the specifics. I really don't know.

are you serious?

 

[PCL_128]

Yes. Next question!

 

[CaptWidgeon]

are you two dating?

 

[PCL_128]

No, I'm too busy with your mom.

Ask a stupid question....

 

[CaptWidgeon]

PCL, how do you know she's not dead?
Feel free to take shots back at me.

 

[RobZerbe]

Just a thought. Since the announcement of the sale of the B717's would that not void or at least open the SL's for amendment and/or changes since much of the agreement was based on the incorporation of the B717?

The agreement was NOT based on the incorporation of the 717.

To wit: the possibility of the 717 not being incorporated is included as part of the agreement.

 

[humveedriver]

The agreement was NOT based on the incorporation of the 717.

To wit: the possibility of the 717 not being incorporated is included as part of the agreement.

The 717 was way too automated for SWA to realistically incorporate into their airline. Boeing would not agree to cover the number of switches, rename the buttons that had "auto" to either on or off, remove the printer, replace the ISIS with a mechanical standby attitude indicator and lastly install a second set of NAV radios, so the pilots can manually tune on the center pedestal. While SWA claims it was a business decision to get rid of the plane, we all know better.

 

[humveedriver]

Duplicate post.

 

[freightdogfred]

That airframe will come back to haunt WN from the other side of concourse C. Look for Big D to put a 717 on every city that WN flies to out of ATL that's east of DEN, and matching or bettering WN's fares. With GK payin the lease for them, why not?

Guess nobody told Anderson you can't make munny with a 717

 

[nwaf16dude]

.......................

 

[dicko]

I wasn't able to find a definition of "equitably" that fit the historic behavior. Perhaps "cunningly" or "virulently" would be a better fit ?

Always happy to help.