LaGarbage Man
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2006
- Posts
- 362
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey LeGarbage,
Don't worry, there will be plenty of local guys lining up for that job and for the 767 F/O jobs with Amerijet. So, you just stay up north (in the freezing cold, I might add) and leave the MIA flying to us locals (that just want to come home........). :smash:
(Before anyone thinks this a flame and roasts me, I'm just kidding with the Garbage Man, as is my duty to do to him...)
And whatever you do, never ever sign a training contract. If it were such a great job .....
Florida West et al. aside. There's nothing wrong with training contracts. A company can require their pilots to sign a training contract and it can still be a great job.
There is nothing going on there. They thought they had another contract, but that went south. No need for crews for their 1 1/2 aircraft. Almost all their flying is S. America for LAN
World Airways is one.Name 2 companies that are "great jobs" that require a contract. Heck name one. Name one past or present that was "a great job" that required a training contract, I cannot think of one, past present or future, if they require a contract it is because they know you would leave at the first other job, if not why would they make you sign one, and don't give me the same lame old line about training cost.
World Airways is one.
His terms at the moment are flying "relief" supplies.A wise yankee from YIP once said "There's no money to be made south of I-10" though I hear he managed to make some-on his terms...
Been there. "Good," not "Great." Still not worth being an indentured servant for 2 years.
A more equitable arrangement would be a two-year training contract alongside a 2-yr no furlough/fire contract. The way contracts are currently written there's a quid but no quo.