On Your Six
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Posts
- 4,507
What's sad is that FLOPS used to be such a desirable place to be. Just a few years ago pilots were clammering to get interviews - and that is no longer the case. I frequently speak with FLOPS pilots on the road. Many are looking elsewhere and all seem to be frustrated. The new contract at NJA has opened their eyes to how bad their current situation is relative to both NJA and CS. I would not be surprised if FLOPS lost a number of pilots to both NJA and CS going forward.
If FLOPS management, including Bob, expect to attract and retain the pilots their owners "expect" to fly them, then conditions will need to improve - that's the point. How can FLOPS expect to be competitive in terms of attracting experienced pilots if their conditions and morale are much worse?
FLOPS is now developing the bad reputation that NJA had prior to the new TA. And that's a shame. I've talked to FLOPS pilots recently, and they are not happy campers. FLOPS management needs to remember - this is a service business... Low morale is transparent to owners despite high levels of professionalism. What FLOPS needs is a pilot workforce proud to represent FLOPS and one that feels it's respected. Sure, NJA's new TA is not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction and I have noticed a considerable uptick in morale among NJA pilots on the road - and that translates into better service and, in the end, hopefully happier owners and higher renewal rates.
Bob and the rest at FLOPS should be feeling a lot of pressure right now to demonstrate that they respect their pilot group. It's obvious CS respects its pilots by bumping up their compensation to competitive levels (CS does not want to lose good pilots who treat their owners well). Not matching NJA or at least boosting compensation in that direction would certainly send the wrong message. It would essentially validate the idea of bringing a union on board. So Bob, if you want a union on the property and you want your best and most-experienced pilots leaving in droves, then continue to ignore the competitive marketplace and continue to disrespect your pilots. The ball is in your court...
If FLOPS management, including Bob, expect to attract and retain the pilots their owners "expect" to fly them, then conditions will need to improve - that's the point. How can FLOPS expect to be competitive in terms of attracting experienced pilots if their conditions and morale are much worse?
FLOPS is now developing the bad reputation that NJA had prior to the new TA. And that's a shame. I've talked to FLOPS pilots recently, and they are not happy campers. FLOPS management needs to remember - this is a service business... Low morale is transparent to owners despite high levels of professionalism. What FLOPS needs is a pilot workforce proud to represent FLOPS and one that feels it's respected. Sure, NJA's new TA is not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction and I have noticed a considerable uptick in morale among NJA pilots on the road - and that translates into better service and, in the end, hopefully happier owners and higher renewal rates.
Bob and the rest at FLOPS should be feeling a lot of pressure right now to demonstrate that they respect their pilot group. It's obvious CS respects its pilots by bumping up their compensation to competitive levels (CS does not want to lose good pilots who treat their owners well). Not matching NJA or at least boosting compensation in that direction would certainly send the wrong message. It would essentially validate the idea of bringing a union on board. So Bob, if you want a union on the property and you want your best and most-experienced pilots leaving in droves, then continue to ignore the competitive marketplace and continue to disrespect your pilots. The ball is in your court...