Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flight Attendant sues Delta and Jetblue in sexy dress dispute

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Eagle757shark

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Posts
575
Flight attendant sues Delta in sexy dress dispute

Associated Press
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
A flight attendant is suing JetBlue Airways and Delta Air Lines, saying a male employee denied her a work-related flight because she wasn’t dressed provocatively enough.

The flight attendant, 37-year-old Karin Keegan of Pittsburgh, works for Delta. The airline has an agreement for JetBlue to ferry Delta flight attendants to job assignments on a standby basis.

Keegan’s lawsuit said a male JetBlue worker wouldn’t let her on a flight in October 2007 because she wasn’t dressed provocatively enough, then allowed other flight attendants with less seniority to board the plane.

“Keegan changed into more provocative clothes, but (the employee) told her she was too late to board the plane and should have dressed like that before,” said the lawsuit, which was filed Friday in Pittsburgh federal court.

“He wanted her to change to a lower-cut shirt and tighter pants, and wear more makeup before letting her on the plane,” Keegan’s attorney, Samuel Cordes, said Monday. Delta and JetBlue officials refused to intercede when she complained, the lawsuit said.

Cordes said Keegan is losing income, though he wouldn’t specify how much, because she has stopped taking JetBlue flights to job assignments so she can avoid harassment by the male employee.

Media relations officials at Atlanta-based Delta did not answer the phone Monday. Bryan Baldwin, a spokesman for JetBlue of Forest Hills, N.Y., said the airline doesn’t comment on litigation.

Keegan sued after complaining to the federal Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. The agency gave Keegan right-to-sue letters late last year.

Cordes said JetBlue told the commission it is not liable because Keegan is not an employee. But federal law enables employees to sue over workplace harassment even when they are not directly employed by the alleged harasser, Cordes said.

Similar suits are often filed by nurses against doctors when harassment occurs in a hospital, he said. Courts have found nurses can sue doctors for workplace harassment, even though the nurses are employed by the hospital, Cordes said.
 
Hmmm...so we can get sued while jumpseating and harrassing another carriers passengers and workers??? Man....all the fun is leaving....
 
this stupid b. is gonna ruin it for everyone. I can see it now no more delta employees allowed to jumpseat on jetblue.

And you'd still feel the same way if this was you wife commuting to work and she was denied the flight, missed her trip, and was basically sexually harassed?

The gate agent should be fired for this.......
 
And you'd still feel the same way if this was you wife commuting to work and she was denied the flight, missed her trip, and was basically sexually harassed?

The gate agent should be fired for this.......

She wasn't. When you hear the story you will cringe.
 
Fired? Are you freaking serious? She is trying to NONREV, she has to abide by the rules of the agreement. If she wants to roll out of bed, throw on some "casual" attire and expect to get no questions, buy a damn ticket. Remember, jumpseating/non-revving is a privilege, not a right.
 
Fired? Are you freaking serious? She is trying to NONREV, she has to abide by the rules of the agreement. If she wants to roll out of bed, throw on some "casual" attire and expect to get no questions, buy a damn ticket. Remember, jumpseating/non-revving is a privilege, not a right.


(The gate agent)

"denied her a work-related flight because she wasn’t dressed provocatively enough"


Where does it say the jumpseater needs to be provocative?

Are you dressed sexy for the gate agents when you jumpseat ?

Do you wear your favorite thong when you jumseat?
Do you wear low cut jeans to show the back of them off?
Are your pants tight enough to show off the outline of your Dinty Moore sausage?:eek:


I'll eat all these words if she was trying to jumpseat in a sweats , then yes I agree with you. We need to look like professionals not the bums that ride our flights. I'm not a against a woman looking sexy, I like eye candy more than the next guy but it should be the individuals choice on how
"provocative" they want to look. (short of showing too much which "should" get you banned from getting on a flight.) It's not the gate agents job to determine what is "provocative"....
“He wanted her to change to a lower-cut shirt and tighter pants" ~ thats bullsh!t and why the gate agent should be fired......
 
She should just be thankful that we don't make her ride in the lav, like we do all the time with other non-revs.
 
Offline jumpseating by FA's on Jetblue has nothing to do with seniority. I'm sure she just got pissed because two younger hotter girls showed up first and she got in trouble for missing work.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top