Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flexjet vs Netjets

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

flynAAvy

Active member
Joined
Feb 27, 2002
Posts
32
I'm too lazy to scroll through the last month of postings (I probably couldn't figure out how to do it anyway) so I'll start a new thread... . Can anyone break down the advantages/disadvantages of Flexjet and Netjets?

By the way, I refuse to pay Kit Darby any more money for his retarded magazine... God bless Flightinfo.... this website got me through a major airline hiring/furlough and gives me an endless source of entertainment while I'm pretending to work at my my new "job". Out.
 
I've known Kit since he resigned his commission and moved to Atlanta looking for an airline job...any airline job. Any money you send to Kit goes for his betterment not yours.
 
Wow, that could be the loaded question of all time. I'll try to be as objective as possible:

FlexJet
#3 in size of the major Fractionals
Non-union
Upgrade times running as much as two years or more (heresay)
Flies only Bombardier equipment
Current hiring rate fairly slow

NetJets
#1 in size (bigger not necessarily better)
Union shop (Teamsters....want any legs broke?)
Upgrade in as short as 3 months or less if you want to take the chance
Lowest pay right now, but contract is in negotiations
Equipment from multiple manufacturers: Cessna, Raytheon, Falcon, Gulfstream
Currently still hiring 40+ a month with no major slowdown in sight

Hope this helps.
 
A friend of mine just got hired with NetJets and all of his clasmates have been told they will be assigned to the Ultra as captains. My friend hasn't heard what equipment he'll get. Do they really need captains so bad that they are hiring off the street?
 
Ya, the guys that are not hired as captains don't have ATP's because they have well under 1500 hrs total time. There taking 1505 hr pilots and giving them a C500 type and ATP ride all at the same time while offering them a Captain position with Captain pay.
********************

No really, the people they're now interviewing are very well qualified. Majority with 121 experience (UAL, US airways, Unameit), or heavy mil time, or previous corporate jet PIC time.

j41driver: are all of the guys taking Capt spots, or are they SIC's with Capt pay because the most junior (and I think youngest) person elected to take a Capt spot?
 
Your friend is mistaken!

j41driver said:
A friend of mine just got hired with NetJets and all of his clasmates have been told they will be assigned to the Ultra as captains. My friend hasn't heard what equipment he'll get. Do they really need captains so bad that they are hiring off the street?

No, they will not be ASSIGNED to the Ultra as Captains. However, if they are brave enough to bid it, I am sure they could hold the left seat immediately out of initial training. The forced upgrades occur from the TOP of the First Officer Seniority List.

gump;)
 
j41driver said:
A friend of mine just got hired with NetJets and all of his clasmates have been told they will be assigned to the Ultra as captains. My friend hasn't heard what equipment he'll get. Do they really need captains so bad that they are hiring off the street?

Absolutely not. Even if the company wanted to, the contract doesn't allow it. New hires can bid Captain, and in the Ultra fleet they might even have the bid awarded, but the company is not going to let them FLY as a PIC until they have a couple hundred hours in type with the company.

When a bid is posted and they don't get enough voluntary bids to fill it, the company then has the OPTION of filling it by reverse seniority of "qualified" pilots. The way the company interprets "qualified" does not include new hires, but focuses on FO's in that fleet over a year who have not upgraded.

Your friend either mid-interpreted what he was told or someone was blowing smoke up his hindquarters.
 
There could be several reasons to not upgrade.....if your not off probation, that might be a reason. Also your schedule. If you are on the 7&7, you will loose that once you start as a captain....alot of people dont want to loose that. Finally, most f/o's are already on cpt pay, so there is no incentive ca$h wise.

I know alot of people say its not a big deal if your on probation when you upgrade, but i would prefer to be off probation myself. Just my obervations/opinion.

1900cpt
 
msw said:
Why are some NetJets FO's reluctant to bid up to Captain slots??

1. They can hold the 7/7 schedule as a high time FO, but not as a low time Capt.
2. Will not get the desired vacation, (same as #1).
3. Do not know the protocol between Capt and company yet.(Paperwork, flight releases, interaction with PMs.)
4. Haven't flown a particular jet in winter ops yet.
5. Haven't flown into high altitude airports yet, such as TEX, ASE, SUN, JAC (previously req'd before upgrade.)
6. Still on probation (12 months)
7. May not have a lot of time in the particular aircraft.
8. They have 20,000+ hours as a retired airline PIC and enjoy the slow lane with less responsibility.


These aren't the guys I worry about. I have to question the ones that want it ASAP. What's the hurry? In a career with 20,000 hours, 1000 hours SIC is a drop in the bucket.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top