Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flaps....Plain, Slotted, or Fowler??

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

BradG

Poor Flight Instructor
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Posts
142
OK, so i need some help setteling a CFI debate. Were sittin here in the flight school debating what kind of flaps a Cessna 172 has, as well as what kind of Flaps a Piper Cherokee(Archer, Warrior) has. We've looked in the POH and they say nothing other than that they are indeed equipped with flaps. Here are our arguments:

172- The flaps DO move slightly aft, although there is a definate slot.

Warrior- Well, we just think their plain.



Thanks
 
172 are fowler, and I believe it says it in the manual too.

Retracted since I check the manual, see my post below.
 
Last edited:
After seeing FlyChicaga's avatar, blown flaps are sounding better and better...
 
BradG said:
OK, so i need some help setteling a CFI debate. Were sittin here in the flight school debating what kind of flaps a Cessna 172 has, as well as what kind of Flaps a Piper Cherokee has.
Are you by any chance a Vero Beach FSI instructor? This sounds an awful lot like some of the discussions we used to have.

"Okay, so how does the vertical component of P-factor affect the aileron drag associated with a Chandelle to the left as opposed to one to the right in an airplane with anhedral wings?"

Good grief...step on the ball and be done with it!
 
hey brad i think I agree with you on the flaps thing. The cessna had fowler flaps...as the manual states. But there could be a debate over the warrior's flaps. The warrior's move slightly back and certainly down but not enough to really be considered fowler. Ok here we go. The warrior flap wasn't designed to let air pass though it (ie. not slotted). Agreeing with kmunn on this the tomahawk is a perfect example of a plain flap. But the warrior flap is not slotted, it's just designed to give a more aerodynamic flow. It's a plain flap too, it's just designed a little more efficiently that's all. Well that's my two cents :)
 
According to the 172S Information Manual it has a single-slot type flap system.

Though according to the FAA def, it's a folwer flap system.
 
I remember reading somewhere that the flaps on the cessna are fowler for the first 10 degrees, the rest is slotted. Made sense to me.
 
Deftone45075 said:
I know of a few people who would argue things like this on the ground, then when they got in an airplane, couldn't figure out how to enter a hold without drawing it.
Ah, you met my first female private pilot student. She thought that having a masters degree in aerodynamics automatically made her a pilot.

My very best student was a guy who was dumb as a rock. It was torture getting him through the written and oral stuff...but get him in the air, and he was a natural.

(Maybe you have to be dumb to be a really good pilot...?)
 
Son listen to me!!!!

Pull the lever down, they go down...

Pull the lever up,, they go up...

Now land the airplane...

Good, Very Good.....

Does it matter??? Fly the airplane..........
 
Cliff said:
Does it matter??? Fly the airplane..........
Actaully it does when the DE asks what type of flaps are on the aircraft.
 
Typhoon1244 said:
Ah, you met my first female private pilot student. She thought that having a masters degree in aerodynamics automatically made her a pilot.
I hear what you're saying, but I had a phd aero engineer psel student once who was both smart and a good stick. a rare combination. We went out to do some acro once after she got her ticket. I usually ease into the acro with new folks, listening for them to "get quiet". We rolled, looped, cuban 8's, reverse 8's, more rolls... Other than a couple of spins, that was her first time to "get upside down" & she stayed right there with me!

Pretty sure KJ's applied to the astronaut program. I'd give her pretty good odds of making it. If she did, it would be neat to say "I taught her how to fly!" ;)
 
ShawnC said:
Actaully it does when the DE asks what type of flaps are on the aircraft.

That's what I make out to be a running joke where I work: What to say when the DE asks what kind the Seminole has. I've heard everything except fowler: plain, slotted, semi-slotted :eek: ,
and split (hey, part of them drops from underneath the nacelle, so they must be split, right?). Whatever. As soon as Piper tells me what kind they are, I'll share it with anyone who asks. Until then, I don't really care. :D
 
The wing flap system in a cesna 172 according to the POH ,
on page 7-10 describes it as a " single slot type wing flap ''

but personally i refer to them as "slotted fowler flaps "

The Guru.
 
Typhoon is right....these inane discussions get out of hand sometimes here @ FSI. In fact, a few instructors in the heat of debate walked the two blocks down to Piper where they were told that they are.....drumroll.....slotted flaps!

Chunk
 
Stupid flight school discussions

Chunk said:
Typhoon is right....these inane discussions get out of hand sometimes here @ FSI . . . .
I'll second that, and especially a few FAR controversies. We had a Chief Pilot at FSI who was convinced that instructors could count their students' approaches as their own for currency. He was also convinced, and tried to convince us, that we could count their night landings as ours. The cheapass didn't want to provide instructors with proficiency time.

(BTW, Chunk, the gentleman in question has been gone for ten years. I know of at least two of his successors, and worked closely with one, and both were vast improvements.)

We had frequent, similar debates at ERAU, too. I'm sure that Tso will agree that ERAU is the home of stupid, and heated, aviation debates, especially those surrounding the Seminole fuel system.

Having said all that, these debates, stupid or not, stimulate learning. They cause you to go into the books and manuals and look up things with a purpose in mind other than just to memorize them for some practical. When learning is purposeful (FOI), you learn, even if just to settle some inane debate.
 
What is there to debate about a Seminole's fuel system?

If anything, the emergency gear release is debate fodder. It's not described well at all!

Chunk
 

Latest resources

Back
Top