Stupid flight school discussions
Chunk said:
Typhoon is right....these inane discussions get out of hand sometimes here @ FSI . . . .
I'll second that, and especially a few FAR controversies. We had a Chief Pilot at FSI who was convinced that instructors could count their students' approaches as their own for currency. He was also convinced, and tried to convince us, that we could count their night landings as ours. The cheapass didn't want to provide instructors with proficiency time.
(BTW, Chunk, the gentleman in question has been gone for ten years. I know of at least two of his successors, and worked closely with one, and both were vast improvements.)
We had frequent, similar debates at ERAU, too. I'm sure that Tso will agree that ERAU is the home of stupid, and heated, aviation debates, especially those surrounding the Seminole fuel system.
Having said all that, these debates, stupid or not, stimulate learning. They cause you to go into the books and manuals and look up things with a purpose in mind other than just to memorize them for some practical. When learning is purposeful (FOI), you learn, even if just to settle some inane debate.