Filing Direct....Whats the real story?

asolo

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2001
Posts
108
Total Time
3600
Can I file IFR direct with my handheld GPS? Some say yes, b/c I have radar from an ARTCC and VOR's. Others say no b/c it's not IFR certified. Whats the real story?
 

browntail

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
61
Total Time
Many
You can file direct. You can only use the handheld for navigation if it is certified IFR, which I doubt it is. The handheld will work though because I used one in the past.

Plain and simple you can do it just don't tell the fed you were using it for navigation.
 

Wiggums

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
1,040
Total Time
.
Is your GPS certified for enroute navigation? Being that your GPS is handheld, I'd say no. If it's not certified you shouldn't be filling direct.
 

browntail

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
61
Total Time
Many
He can file direct just based on the vor navigation. We used to do this constantly in the check flying business. Your right though, using the handheld as sole means of IFR navigation would not be legal if a fed were on board.

No fed on board, have fun with the handheld. It sure makes flying safer and more relaxing. No more getting lost! LOL!
 

Speedtree

lovin' life
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Posts
193
Total Time
4000
It's your call, the FARs require you to fly a straight line between points defined by your flight-plan/clearance. 91.181 How you do this is up to you. You can dead reckon as was previously mentioned. There was an article about this very subject in the one of the aviation safety type magazines, "IFR Refresher" I believe. The controllers said if you want to do it they don't care.
The question remains whether you would do it with a FED on board and the answer is probably "no". However most of us don't fly with the FEDs every day so have at it and be prepared to double check yourself to make sure everything is as it should be. Don't rely on that handheld exclusively and fall asleep on the way to your destination.

As you may have noticed ATC gives you headings direct if you request it. Your handheld just saves a step in the process.

That's my take.
 

jrod

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Posts
56
Total Time
3500
727 Drivers

I have heard that some 727 drivers at the majors would occasionally bring a handheld GPS for nav. They would tell ATC that they had a xxx heading to somewhere and would ask for a vector on that heading. Technically, they are on a radar vector, but they would fly off the GPS, so they are still legal.
 

Fr8Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2001
Posts
155
Total Time
2800
Ok now I can't remember where I heard this, but I know I have. Someone once told me that you can file direct anytime you can triangulate your position with VOR's or NDB's. Since I have nothing to do during the day I will read though the FAR/AIM tommrow and see if I can come up with a reference for you. We have GPS in all of our 207, 402, BE99's and they are VFR only so we file /A or /U on our flight plans and for our route just put direct in there and I have never have been questioned. Heck when they give us an intersection we have to ask for the lat/longs becuase we don't intersections in our GPS's.
 

a pilot

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Posts
6
Total Time
3500+
i think you are all missing the main point here.The fligth plan that is where the FED will get you. You can only file golf if your gps is IFR approved "AND" if you have received appropriate trainning from a qualified person, so it is not even a question of having a FED in the aircraft, it is about how are you going to get there!!!
This is why the 727 drivers (read post above ) are asking for a initial heading , that is the only way to stay on the legal side using a VFR GPS
 

starchkr

New Bus driver
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
1,065
Total Time
enough
asolo,

YES you can file direct anytime with a handheld. You don't even need your handheld to file direct. As long as you can fly between two points and do not deviate from your 4 mile wide corridor you are legal to do so. Whether you just have an ADF onboard to get between those points, or the most sophisticated navigation systems known to man, it is all legal.
 

Fr8Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2001
Posts
155
Total Time
2800
Starchkr and A Pilot I agree 100% with both of you. Filing /G you should only do when you have an IFR GPS on board and you have the proper training to use the thing. So just file /U, /A, or /I whatever you are and file direct like Starchkr said when you have a GPS on board just don't file /G when you are not. Hey Starchkr I guess this goes to prove that us night freight pilots do it best!!! By the way where are you based out of????
 

starchkr

New Bus driver
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
1,065
Total Time
enough
I am based in Jackson, MS. All of our flight plans are canned as /I, but sometimes that equipment does not even help out. That is when you need to be good at triangulation and keep track of your flight progress. I currently have a plane with just an ADF and two navs to get from place to place (this is the backup plane that no one ever wants to fly because of the equipment). It is difficult, but i can depart JAN flying direct to HOU (~300 miles) and have no problem finding it, even after they give a reroute onto the arrivals. Of course after months of flying this route you kind of get a feeling for the direction you need to go, and when it is clear you can verify your position over known lakes and towns and stuff like that. The whole point is is that we are always filed direct, and it is legal because we can get there without breaking regs.
 

LR25

Its just a vintage VW
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
1,641
Total Time
7000
I was flying IFR a while back and a controller asked me did I have Rnav out of the blue. I said no. Then he asked if I could "identify" a certiam fix, I proptly said yes.

The next thing out of his mouth was NXYZ you are clear direct XYZ fix, and I said thanks buddy and didnt ask anymore questions.

I had a non IFR Loran, it did the trick though.

As far as legalities, some have told me both that it was illegal and it was not. Reason being its not was because I was in radar environment and he was monitoring progress.

Oh well, it worked for me.

LR25
 

SeaBass

Active member
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Posts
31
Total Time
2000
What we use to do is ask the controllers for a heading or request a certain heading then direct when able...fully seeing on the non IFR certified GPS that it was a particular heading. "Any chance a 275 degree heading and when able direct XYZ?"

Happy Flyings!

--SeaBass
 

jetdriven

restraint order pending
Joined
Dec 23, 2001
Posts
517
Total Time
6600
legally to file GPS under IFR you have to have a TSO Certified GPS with terminal and approach capability. no handhelds currently meet this requirement.
that being said you can use a handheld GPS to your benefit, most of the tricks and tips here are valid. Here's one, say you have a flight plan with several VORS. Pick the one that is almost to your destination, say you're recieving it and ask for direct.
also the "we're showing 255 heading to houston, can we get direct?" works pretty well too.
 

n2fx

New member
Joined
Feb 9, 2002
Posts
2
Total Time
9550
In order to go direct you need the approved equipment to do so. This of course shows up in your equipment suffix as in /G, /I, or if you are a big guy /E, /F, /R. If you have vor/dme RNAV (eg, a KNS80) and file /I the ole handheld GPS works just fine and you are legal. If you file /U, /A you better not accept or ask for direct to anything beyond VOR reception range. If you file /G or /I you better have em.
 

Chocks

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2002
Posts
100
Total Time
5000 +
Gotta love direct

You don't have to have a /R or /G to go direct. All you have to say is "request direct XXX" ATC doesn't care - it probably helps them out. The issue is the legality - don't say "GPS direct" or "RNAV Direct" just "Direct". Claim pilotage or DR. Back yourself up with VORs/TACANs and be smart if a FED is onboard.

Chocks
 

MartinFierro

Flyin' Gaucho
Joined
Jan 7, 2002
Posts
89
Total Time
is now
You don't have to have a /R or /G to go direct. All you have to say is "request direct XXX" ATC doesn't care - it probably helps them out. The issue is the legality - don't say "GPS direct" or "RNAV Direct" just "Direct". Claim pilotage or DR.
Several people have mentioned it is OK to file or request direct and use pilotage. People, remember that we are talking about an IFR flight plan, which assumes you will have no problem navigating your route in total IMC!!!! Man, if you people can navigate by pilotage from the inside of clouds, you guys must be some pilots! :rolleyes:

As far as it being OK to request direct with non-certified IFR GPS and the like based on the fact that you are in a radar environment, I disagree. What happens then if you lose Comm? And are in IMC? This is why you need to really be able to navigate on your own if you go direct. If you request it and get it, then be sure you can do it without running into something.
 

n2fx

New member
Joined
Feb 9, 2002
Posts
2
Total Time
9550
YEAH Martin.....BOO Chocks...

FAR 91.205(d)(2) requires...navigational equipment to the ground facilities to be used

AIM Table 1-1-8, footnote 4 ..vfr and handheld GPS systems are not authorized for IFR navigation...ONLY an aid to situational awareness.

Other notes:
/R is now only to be used for RNP qualified systems which generally are multisensor ....including GPS PLUS VOR/DME RNAV PLUS INS etc
PLUS does not mean OR. VOR/DME does not qualify for RNP thus /R can not be used...use /I

Chocks..... TACAN ??? All those with TACAN please raise your right hand. If your "backup" is VOR you better really study up on your DR techniques and methodologies that allow you to go direct so you can splain it to the man ( and the rest of us too).

Like most issues it aint a problem until it's a problem ...like a gross navigational error in IMC with lost comm while you're DR-ing. GOOD LUCK!!
 
Top