Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Felony revisited

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
He enlisted in the military after high school, and didn't make it through boot camp because of this problem. What he says happened was he was owed money by another in camp and so he took one of his checks from his locker and filled it out and cashed it. Dumb thing to do he admits, and now he is paying the price. He decided to be a pilot a few years later, got a 4 year degree and his ratings and CFI'ed a bit and then got a 135 job.
He faxed me a copy of the record and it doesn't say anything about convictions but says "charge: larceny and forgery, administrative discharge in lieu of court martial, no further prosecutory action required.
He's trying to talk himself into it meaning that was no conviction.
Also he says he never signed anything admitting guilt.
Simply, I told him to get a good lawyer who knows military law, but I also told him this is probably going to be hard to remove. Probably impossible!
 
This is not the same thing as a civil felony conviction. What does his DD214 actually say?

Most won't like the advice, but have the guy pull his DD214, local, state and federal record and if the only place this stunt can be found is on some military report ... he should probably keep his mouth shut next interview. Don't ask ... don't tell.

Minh
 
Erlanger,
I am glad to hear that your friend has "turned over a new leaf." However, I am sad to say that I doubt he would be able to hold a SIDA badge. Not required, but most airlines prefer pilots to have them at their home base (unless you're based in MSP.) We had a FA get canned for having a felony and not reporting it. After 6 years of service, he was found out when the MEM airport required the FBI to process SIDA badge holder's fingerprints.

On a side note, if your friend would like to revisit the life of crime,which I doubt he does, he should apply to Mesaba. A chief pilot or DFO job would be a good fit for someone who is, shall we say, legally challenged.
 
Previous info was from FBI records.
DD214 says, under Reason for Separation: In lieu of trial by court martial. And under Character of Service it says; Other then honorable discharge.

It doesn't mention the larceny or forgery charge.

No other info. concerning this matter is on the DD214.

As far as not telling an employer about this, I understand that a military background check is usually done whether you state that you have military service or not. So he ain't getting away with this.
 
Sounds like he's screwed. Sorry to hear that.

I've met a lot of guys who've made a decent career out of 135, including one old fart (older than me, even) who spent his entire career flying piston twin and Caravan freighters or King Airs on Part 135. He was wise with his money and will retire in the next five to ten years to fish full time in Topsail Island. It ain't exactly the same as 30 years at Delta, but he said he's loved the life and will live comfortably when he hangs it up.

So ... things could be worse.


Minh
 
Not sure how it applies to 135, if at all, but ...

Under the new rules for unescorted access, specific offenses are listed as disqualifying. In most states, a DWI is now a felony, but it is not on the list of offenses. So, theoretically, you could be hired at SWA with a felony not on the list. But good luck actually getting on with one (a non-DWI offense). I had a misdemeanor over ten years ago (non DWI) and I've had two regional HR people tell me that I might need to 'change my career expectations'.

Minh
 
For anyone looking at the DD214, a OTH (other than honorable) is a red flag. Will probably take an act of congress to change the checkbox on the DD214.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top