Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Fatigue at CAL?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I know one solution - hire more pilots.
 
How long have you been at CAL again? Do you have any experience in CAL 777 flight operations? Why don't you wait till the facts of this incident come out before you hustle to analyze it based on your few months of line flying at CAL...

You know something? You're right. Although I'm perfectly capable of and entitled to comment on this issue regardless of my background, employer and seniority, there's the whole question of "should". The fact remains I was a little pissed when I first read about this incident and considered the consequences, and spoke out in a manner that does not accurately reflect my personality.

My apologies for acting like an ass and thank you for pointing it out. (Seriously.)

Now that I've spit the chunks of leather out of my mouth, allow me to say this:

There are a lot of issues at play here. This goes far beyond a simple crew error, and gets into areas such as training culture and procedures design. My fervent hope is that CAL's management possesses enough leadership to treat these guys with some empathy, and put the details of this incident out there in the "daylight" for all Continental's pilots to learn and benefit from.

In the aviation industry, there is far too often a failure to have any sort of institutional memory over some of our mistakes, instead of us embracing the fact we are human and error prone. I'm not suggesting the crews of any particular airline go around wearing events such as these as badges of honor, but they are issues that need to be formally addressed, dissected, discussed and not forgotten by Aviators.
 
In the crew room the other day:

Continental Airlines:
Work Hard

Fly Tired

Die Young


We got to remember and tell all the 95+ hours pick upers that rules are more important than pay rates. You can always get the pay back.
 
Our airmanship is in our own hands, not the company.

I agree with you that something has got to give, but we cannot afford to make these kind of mistakes, period. If PBS has us so fatigued that we are almost getting shot down, then we better start calling in fatigued.

Personally, I think the onus lies on us here. This is our wake up call. Are you going to point fingers at CAL or start looking at your own discipline?

Cheers.

Yes, we have to look at our own discipline. But even the company knows that something is up. The new CAL "Legacy Class" that all pilots have to go to this year introduced a new term: "driftdown."

As it was defined/discussed in the class, driftdown is essentially external pressures causing the slow decay of CRM during a flight and a pairing due to loss of focus and concentration leading to lapses in discipline and possible clearance deviations (and always the possibility of something "more serious")

A fine new concept to introduce into the CRM concept and our lexicon, but when the external pressures are caused by the company itself then you've got to wonder what's up.

I think a better term would be "pushdown." A company pushes its employees as far as it possibly can before employee moral or retention starts affecting the bottom line and the bosses' bonuses. In this particular industry though the bottom line involves people being alive or dead.

And that pushing is what is going on throughout the industry. One airline after another has gutted the work rules of its pilots (sometimes, unfortunately, with the pilots' cooperation). The industry as a whole wants to see how far it can push the pilots before the operation breaks.

Nearly every day you read about the red flags. A cancelled flight because the captain lost his composure during a cell phone call. A heart attack in flight. A heart attack in the jetway. Taxi incidents. Many more I'm sure.

The irony in all this? The Legacy Class is mandatory but essentially unpaid. Talk about causing driftdown. How do you think the pilots feel about working a PBS driven 90+ hours per month then taking one of their 12 days off for a class that tells then not to "let the pressure affect your judgment and performance" and ohbytheway you're not getting paid for this.

This is just a new and modern way of saying "do whatever it takes and push it to the limit and over" but if something goes wrong you will get no backup from us because you are responsible for saying "no more, I'm fatigued" (why didn't you?)--and even losing pay for that (which is a whole nother story at CAL).
 
This reminds me of a thread when I was landing in ATL and an Cirtrus wouldn't get out of the dang way.....................
 
A fine new concept to introduce into the CRM concept and our lexicon, but when the external pressures are caused by the company itself then you've got to wonder what's up.

I think a better term would be "pushdown." A company pushes its employees as far as it possibly can before employee moral or retention starts affecting the bottom line and the bosses' bonuses. In this particular industry though the bottom line involves people being alive or dead. . . . . . . . .

. . . This is just a new and modern way of saying "do whatever it takes and push it to the limit and over" but if something goes wrong you will get no backup from us because you are responsible for saying "no more, I'm fatigued" (why didn't you?)--and even losing pay for that (which is a whole nother story at CAL).

I think we can all identify with this . . . I know I can.


.
 
This reminds me of a thread when I was landing in ATL and an Cirtrus wouldn't get out of the dang way.....................

Funny . . . when going into ATL and I know it's Citrus, or ASA. or Delta, I know they will clear by the second high-speed, and so I'll tighten it up a little closer . . . .

Now, a Citrus guy in your way going into IAH, or JFK, that I could believe . . . those are not our regular stomping grounds. . . . if you see me there, it's because something is very wrong in Gotham City . . . . ;)
 
So what's the story with your guys TA? On another thread it seemed a lot of guys were singing the management blues. Are you guys going to hang tough or be pushed by the loud minority?? I hope you guys hang tough. We all need to squeeze management since they are all rolling in money and laughter from US the workers! Hang tough brother!
 
You know something? You're right. Although I'm perfectly capable of and entitled to comment on this issue regardless of my background, employer and seniority, there's the whole question of "should". The fact remains I was a little pissed when I first read about this incident and considered the consequences, and spoke out in a manner that does not accurately reflect my personality.

My apologies for acting like an ass and thank you for pointing it out. (Seriously.)

Now that I've spit the chunks of leather out of my mouth, allow me to say this:

There are a lot of issues at play here. This goes far beyond a simple crew error, and gets into areas such as training culture and procedures design. My fervent hope is that CAL's management possesses enough leadership to treat these guys with some empathy, and put the details of this incident out there in the "daylight" for all Continental's pilots to learn and benefit from.

In the aviation industry, there is far too often a failure to have any sort of institutional memory over some of our mistakes, instead of us embracing the fact we are human and error prone. I'm not suggesting the crews of any particular airline go around wearing events such as these as badges of honor, but they are issues that need to be formally addressed, dissected, discussed and not forgotten by Aviators.

Tried to PM, but your mailbox was full. So I'll throw it on here. My contention with your post was that it hit our guys on 90 pretty hard. As I eluded to before, it isn't fair to do this until the facts come out. I don't take news stories from the media or any government as the true story. The company is now even saying our guys made every position report required.

I will agree with you in one regard. No blame on this incident should lie in fatigue/PBS/second divorce/etc...

No matter how cr@ppy life issues might be, a true professional knows how to keep his/her focus when it comes to safety at our office. As to our culture, I'll let you guys talk about that all day. I'm no expert, but I see the same personalities at CAL that I've seen/heard at every airline. That being said, by in large I have seen great leadership and CRM thus far on the 73.

Basically I said what I said, because it seemed our guys were getting the feet to the fire awful fast. I know I would be p'od if I was ever involved in an incident and the Monday Morning QBing started based on a news blurb. I keep that in mind when it comes to judging the actions of others. It's a respect I try to carry towards my coworkers. Do apologize for harsh tone, but I felt some perspective was needed at the time.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top