Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Fake picture?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Typhoon1244

Member in Good Standing
Joined
Jul 29, 2002
Posts
3,078
Does this picture look fake to you guys? I can't put my finger on it, but something looks weird about it. (Plus, he's awful forceful about defending its veracity..."see the shadow over the ground?"

He also took this one. If they are real, how'd he get the shots? :eek:
 
Looks fake to me too. I think you'd see a little bit more of a heat plume coming out of the back of the motors if it were real. The landscape under the 747 looks manufactured and that Mad Dog looks like someone cut it out of a magazine or something. Also they look way too clean. If they are in fact real, this guy has one hell of knack for setting the F-stop and picking lenses for his camera.

SK:cool:
 
Last edited:
I can't quite put my finger on it either. They DO look fake, but at the same time, they may be real. I would really like to know how he got those pictures.
 
If you believe me or not, that is the question. I used to be roomates with the photographer. He is currently a F/O for COEX and he explained the shots.

The first one: VFR corridor over LAX in a C-172 with a heavily laden 744 off 24L.

The second one: final for 29L in a C-172 with the AA MD80 on final for 29R that starts about 1,500 feet before 29L.
 
rchcfi said:
I used to be roomates with the photographer.
Jesus, this is a small industry! :D

Well, your old roomie needs to allow his photographic skills to degrade a bit...he's too good. I looked at his stuff and said, "naaah, can't be real."
 
And I forgot to mention. He is one hell of a photographer. He's been photo'ing aircraft for over 10 years.
 
I've flown the LAX coridor a few times, u can get suprisingly close, but this guy still seems like a great photographer...
 
There is nothing in the way of topography within 20 miles of LAX that looks anything like the background in either of those photos.

Those photos are about as real as the fun bags on Pamela Anderson.
 
They looked funny to me too.

I sent them to my brother-in-law in an email ( he has been retouching photos in NY for 23 years) and he said they looked like they were "overlaid and airbrushed". I dont know what that means? Before his children were born he used to bring some work home. Mostly magazine ads. I loved the Playboy picks. He would take gaps out of the girls teeth, cover tatoos and go so far as taking weight off their thighs and "lifting" their breasts.

Maybe he ment they are real pictures that were cleaned up to look better. Maybe I'll bother him again for some clairity.
 
MetroSheriff said:
There is nothing in the way of topography within 20 miles of LAX that looks anything like the background in either of those photos.

Those photos are about as real as the fun bags on Pamela Anderson.

MetroSheriff,

The monarch butterfly reserve off the end of the 24s and 25s, right before the shoreline, look EXACTLY like this. You are mistaken in your comments about topography surrounding LAX. The area shown in picture 1 used to be open for people to park and watch airplanes. Post 9/11, all the roads are closed off the departure end. But, I am very familiar with the area, and the picture is consistent with the area surrounding LAX.
 
English said:
MetroSheriff,

The monarch butterfly reserve off the end of the 24s and 25s, right before the shoreline, look EXACTLY like this. You are mistaken in your comments about topography surrounding LAX. The area shown in picture 1 used to be open for people to park and watch airplanes. Post 9/11, all the roads are closed off the departure end. But, I am very familiar with the area, and the picture is consistent with the area surrounding LAX.

Yep, it looks exactly like the old resort area off the west end of the 24's. There are still a bunch of pads and foundations from the beach houses that used to be there, and the localizer hut in the picture is just off the end of runway 24L. Before I saw the responses to this, I thought he might have shot from the VFR corridor, but it is still an amazing piece of photography
 
I am 100% sure these are Microsoft flight sim planes overlaid on real terrain. Look how fake the shadows are.

Nice job, but fakes nonetheless.
 
I better hang low for a while before you guys start questioning my avatar which was taken on my long solo x-c.
 
I’m not lost; nobodies lost; you just might be temporarily unable to accurately pinpoint your position.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top