KSU,
>>>>I don't believe that too (sic) be true.
It really doesn't matter what you believe, what matters is what the courts believe. Like it or not, the FAA deals in administrative law, and like it or not, in administrative law, constitutional rights are not applicable.
Example: A police officer may not just stroll into your house and have a look around to see if there's any evidence of illegal activity. He has to have a warrant executed by a judge. But let's suppose you own a building which you operate a business out of. Occupational Safety is administrative law, and an OSHA inspector may in fact inspect your property for safety or health violations without probable cause or a warrant.
Likewise a police officer may not fine you for something like disturbing the peace, under our constitution such a penalty cannot be assesed without due process. (you may however waive your right to a court hearing and pay a fine based on your choice not to contest) By contrast, if the OSHA inspector finds a safety violation at your bussiness, you may indeed be fined without due process. Administrative law is indeed a very different animal, and the constitution is not necessarily applicable.
By the way, I'm still waiting for your answers to my quiz, and for you to tell us where Part 91 calls for Operations Specifications for Part 91 operators.
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2162&perpage=25&pagenumber=2
Regards