Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

End of a proud line of Airplanes

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Diesel-9sRule

Active member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Posts
32
Boeing announces the end of production of the B-717. See Boeing Commercial Web Site for more details.

Today is a sad day for a fine line of aircraft...and for the city of Long Beach.
 
It's a sad day but it's not surprising. My best wishes to the workers in Long Beach. By the way, a recent issue of "Air & Space Smithsonian" had an interesting article about the possible end of the 717 line and its effect on the workers there.

R.I.P., DC-9/S-80/717
 
Over half my total pilot time is in the DC-9/717/MD80. I'd still like to get a -30 and make a couple of circuits around the pattern. Lots of fun.TC
 
Guitar Guy said:
It's a sad day but it's not surprising. My best wishes to the workers in Long Beach. By the way, a recent issue of "Air & Space Smithsonian" had an interesting article about the possible end of the 717 line and its effect on the workers there.

R.I.P., DC-9/S-80/717


I'm glad they're gone. I always hated that plane. Boeing 737s rule! All other planes are crap!
 
Bite me Dave :mad: . First you furlough me, then you trash talk the DC-9. Something about straws and Camels here ;) :p .

It is sad to see the end of the line. The 717 would have done a lot better had Boeing been at all interested in marketing the aircraft. The Long Beach pilots took the plane to the Paris Airshow in 1999, this just a short time after Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas. Surprisingly, that trip actually sold the aircraft to Boeing executives who previously had no clue that they could market a 100+ seat aircraft. They were heard to say, " maybe we could sell a few of these ". At least that trip kept the line open until now. Had Boeing started a few years earlier then I'm sure more deals could have been made. Of course it didn't help a lot when AA got rid of the type during the TWA merger.

The drawdown at the Long Beach facility has been going on for years. With production stopping on the MD-11, MD-80, and MD-90 all in quick succession it was just a matter of time for this to happen. Most of the people working there have prepared themselves for it as they knew it was just a matter of time. Some have, and others will, make the shift over to the C-17 facility and maybe some will get positions in Seattle. Most of the pilots have either retired or moved on long ago. For those that remain and aren't eligible for retirement yet, I hope Seattle sees fit to give them a position. They are all outstanding gentlemen and excellent pilots.

Sadly, I didn't get to fly the 717, I left Long Beach and went back to USAir during the flight test phase. I have been fortunate enough to fly the DC-9-10, DC-9-30, MD-81/82/83/87/88, MD-90, and MD-90EFD. They are all great airplanes to fly, each with their own high points. I'll carry many fond memories of flying the type with me for the rest of my career. The DC-9-30 is the first jet I flew and I credit it with making me the pilot I am today. I pity the pilots who start flying EFIS/Glass equipped jets with good autopilots who don't get the chance to hone their hand flying and navigation skills on a basic jet.

When the last 717 rolls off the production line it will mark the end of a great chapter in aviation history. Fortunately the type will keep flying for many years to come and some of you lucky guys will get to fly it.


Typhoonpilot
 
I resemble that remark!

AA717driver said:
Over half my total pilot time is in the DC-9/717/MD80. I'd still like to get a -30 and make a couple of circuits around the pattern. Lots of fun.TC


I just broke over 6K in type from the DC9-10 to the -83.

"Little yellow buttom you're all mine, you're just another DC9."
 
Big words from Mr. "Flip-jet"

Dave Siegel said:
I'm glad they're gone. I always hated that plane. Boeing 737s rule! All other planes are crap!

You totally such, Dave and your mother is ugly!

PS: Don't forget your 3 big items as the rudder takes you over:

1. Autopilot off

2. autothrottles off

3. Yaw damper off

Those aren't memory items on the DC9 type.
 
I miss the days of getting wet every time it rained while sitting in the 9.
What a piece of crap!!!!
I thought I would share some fond memories too.
 
b747dogg said:
I miss the days of getting wet every time it rained while sitting in the 9.
What a piece of crap!!!!
I thought I would share some fond memories too.

Oh, come on, a little de-ice fluid in your coke never hurt anyone! ;) Maybe that's why there's so much room between the seat and the sidewall--most of the water will drain onto your flight bag instead on you.

I remember the storage bin on the sidewall was called the "aquarium" by the OZ guys. It was always full of water! :D

None of this sterile A320 crap with us ex-9 pilots!TC

P.S.--I always knew that if I got killed in a DC9 it would be because of something I did, not the airplane killing me.
 
AA717driver said:
Oh, come on, a little de-ice fluid in your coke never hurt anyone! ;) Maybe that's why there's so much room between the seat and the sidewall--most of the water will drain onto your flight bag instead on you.


I remember the glycol dripping in to my coffe cup!!! This was after
a few years of flying it....

I remember the storage bin on the sidewall was called the "aquarium" by the OZ guys. It was always full of water! :D

We called that the "live well"

Other than hot in the summer and getting dripped on. It was a good jet to fly.
We will be flying them well into the next decade.
Dave B
NWA
 
5147 Hrs

500 Aproaches

1643 Landings

AA717, can I join you on that trip around the patch?

If you couldn't hand fly an airplane before you got in the 9, you sure could by the end of the month. :D
 
Jeff Helgeson said:
You totally such, Dave and your mother is ugly!

PS: Don't forget your 3 big items as the rudder takes you over:

1. Autopilot off

2. autothrottles off

3. Yaw damper off

Those aren't memory items on the DC9 type.

And how about the memory items for a runaway elevator trim with a jammed jackscrew?
 
AA717driver said:
I'd still like to get a -30 and make a couple of circuits around the pattern. Lots of fun.TC

Yup, lotsa fun! When I checked out right seat of a -30 at a charter outfit we had to do our bounces in the airplane since the sim landings didn't count... so off we went around the patch wearing jeans and T shirts (I think the instructor was wearing shorts and flip-flop sandals), doing touch n goes and burning up company gas money. What a blast that was...

I have a whopping grand total of 150 hrs in DC-9s, 30 series... my first jet. It's a great ship, glad I got to fly it (if only a little) before they all end up scrapped for beer cans.
 
And how about the memory items for a runaway elevator trim with a jammed jackscrew?

A source close to the investigation said the National Transportation Safety Board's draft report on the crash will conclude that a lack of lubrication of the jackscrew caused excessive wear and caused the gimbal nut -- which moves the two-foot jackscrew up and down to adjust to stabilizer -- to fail.
The report is expected to focus on potential contributing factors, including a lack of Federal Aviation Administration oversight of Alaska Airlines maintenance operations.

Your point being what ? Faulty maintenance versus design flaw are two very different things.


TP
 
A Norwegian I did some flying with, told me that SAS and McD had a very good relationship, and that SAS only bought McD aircraft. In the mid 90s, SAS decided to start trying other aircraft (Boeing), and at that point, McD decided to give up and sell to Boeing.

But it hasnt worked out well at all for SAS either, and now they are even trying out airbus, and have had a fair amount of problems with integration and crew training costs since deciding to have different aircraft types. The pilots were apparently pretty happy with the DC-9 and were wanting the 717, not the Boeings.

I do not know enough about it to know how true it is, just what a norsk pilot told me.
 
Dave you're kidding yourself shags!!!!!

I was lucky enough to fly the 717 up till recently in Australia, and regulaly we were asked to keep the speed on below 10k, usually overtaking slow 737's!

The day you can fly your 737 to 12miles from touchdown at 320kts and still make it in comfortably (and I do mean very comfortably), you let me know...HAHAHA!!!! (Actually got to 9miles one day)

Gear out at 300kts...mmm, like to see that in a 737 :D

The 9 / 80 / 90 / 717 line was THE sweetest looking thing the sky...now they all look the same, boring!
 
zoohead said:
Dave you're kidding yourself shags!!!!!


The day you can fly your 737 to 12miles from touchdown at 320kts and still make it in comfortably (and I do mean very comfortably), you let me know...HAHAHA!!!! (Actually got to 9miles one day)

Gear out at 300kts...mmm, like to see that in a 737 :D

QUOTE]

True, wont work in a 737 but a 727 will do 320 to the marker.

Those 9s were so good they quit making them.
 
Two fun things about the 9/717

Having an ATL controller ask us "what speed can you hold to DEPOT, I can get you infront of DL , can you help us out"?

And

Catching up to and Passing 737's on AR1, then sitting a couple milesbelow and in front. Until you hear those words " CAL XXX turn right HDGXXX, vectors for descent"

Simple pleasures....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top