Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Ejm

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Very True!!!!!


KSU,
Put the pipe down and step away from the keyboard. Either you don't know WTF you are talking about or you were discussing terms with the ACME Aircaft Management Corp., because every one of your 6 points was either completely incorrect or misguided.

GIVSP,
I'm no great fan of 135 (although we do it with a management company) but if thats the route the boss wants to go you might as well accept it. Our guy likes it because he doesn't fly that much (or so he thinks) and it makes him feel good to know we're out there making him a couple bucks instead of the plane sitting in the hangar for 14-20 days a month.
All depends on the relationship you have with the mgmt. company and the owner.

I'm sorry. If I had known that putting FACTS on a thread requesting information was such a sin I would have abstained.

Of course, I based my information on the information that the management company gave me and I made that clear in the first couple of sentences. But I'm guessing that doesn't matter to a big man like you.
 
It all depends on the mgmt company you talked to. KSU isn't wrong, it is what he heard. I've heard the same thing and thought they were nuts.

There are good ones and bad ones. May not be too many left after the next couple of months. Those that survive, should be those that do it right.
 
I'm sorry. If I had known that putting FACTS on a thread requesting information was such a sin I would have abstained.

Of course, I based my information on the information that the management company gave me and I made that clear in the first couple of sentences. But I'm guessing that doesn't matter to a big man like you.

toughen up, buttercup.
 
ksu, sorry for being negative. What you posted seemed so far from anything I have ever heard regarding management companies. I hope your boss laughed at their offer.
 
To be on EJM, don't all crewmembers have to meet certain flight time requirements?

They REALLY want a type and some jet time, not sure about hard mins.....I've flown with 2 or 3 ex-EJM guys, it sounds like EJM has their s*** togeter.........one of them said they were expecting to manage around 200 aircraft by the end of 2008......
 
SIU's avatars are the only reason I visit this board.

This one IS a little tame. The previous two were smokin', though.

Everyone is entitled to a off day every so often. ;) TC
 
SIU's avatars are the only reason I visit this board.

This one IS a little tame. The previous two were smokin', though.

Everyone is entitled to a off day every so often. ;) TC
You dont find this girl amazing? I was thinking that she was the best I have ever posted.
 
Um...

Maybe I can help....if this thread is not dead yet.

We just put our plane (CE750) on with EJM as a charter managed account. That means we are still employees of the owner, but work as EJM employees during the 135 flights.

I will touch on some of the disputed points.

Insurance - Our premiums for the 135 through EJM remained basically the same - We carry a TON of liability to begin with so no biggie there.

Conformity - The only expense we incurred during conformity was the replacement of some worn seat belt TSO labels and a armrest bracket that the fine folks at EJM maintenance stripped while reassembling.

Flight Time Minimums - This is a case by case basis, but as rice mentioned earlier a type and some jet time will make things easy.

The operational control issue is per A008 - EJM has operational control over all all 135 flights.

There is an added cost of the initial indoc in CVG, the 135.293, 135.297 at FSI or Simuflight and the all important 135.299 in the airplane.

The day the airplane officially went on certificate (recently) we began getting calls for charter flights - so the market is not completely dead.

EJM is definitely a first-class organization. Period.
 
Maybe I can help....if this thread is not dead yet.

We just put our plane (CE750) on with EJM as a charter managed account. That means we are still employees of the owner, but work as EJM employees during the 135 flights.

There is an added cost of the initial indoc in CVG, the 135.293, 135.297 at FSI or Simuflight and the all important 135.299 in the airplane.

The day the airplane officially went on certificate (recently) we began getting calls for charter flights - so the market is not completely dead.

EJM is definitely a first-class organization. Period.

That sounds more like what I've heard.... Hey Notfurloughed, 2 questions-

If I'm not getting to personal, since you work under the EJM banner on 135 flights, you get the same benefits as the NJA guys, correct??

Any idea how many birds EJM is managing right now?? is that number I posted correct (about 200).

Just curious...
 
CAL....

The answer to your first question is....since we are charter managed we are not considered true employees of EJM. Therefore, we have the benefits that the A/C owner provides. We do get full support from EJM during charter flights as far as trip briefings, flight following, maintenance, etc. Also, we get all of the operational benefits of being a NetJets company - fuel prices, low landing and handling fees, FSI discounts, etc.

The full managed accounts are considered full-time EJM employees and receive the appropriate full-time benefits.

As far as # of planes on certificate - I know the number in early December was around 185 and growing.

Hope that helps....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top