void
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2002
- Posts
- 110
A few things.
I'm not taking sides on this, but it really isn't suprising that Eagle lost the arbitration. If AMR is good at anything it is probobly fighting lawsuits.
Contract carriers have been around for a long time, they are nothing new. ACA started in '89, Mesa in '82, Trans States in ' 82, Chautauqua in '73, Skywest in ' 72, and Mesaba in '44 (believe it or not.) It doesn't look like they are going to turn around and disappear any time soon.
I wouldn't be suprised to see a franchise type airline sometime in the futrure. An airline where everything is contracted out to different carriers, everything from long-haul international, down to 50-100 mile hops.
As far as Chautauqua getting MCO from Comair. Chautauqua is cheaper for the fact they are flying not just 50 seat EMB-145's, but 37 seat EMB-135's. It fits more into DAL's designs of phasing out turbo-props. Flying a 135 is seemingly cheeper than flying either the 40 or 50 seat CRJ. It also fits the markets better. The 135 can also get in and out of EYW with a full load of people, which both the CRJ-200 and the CRJ-700 cannot do.
Just my two cents.
I'm not taking sides on this, but it really isn't suprising that Eagle lost the arbitration. If AMR is good at anything it is probobly fighting lawsuits.
Contract carriers have been around for a long time, they are nothing new. ACA started in '89, Mesa in '82, Trans States in ' 82, Chautauqua in '73, Skywest in ' 72, and Mesaba in '44 (believe it or not.) It doesn't look like they are going to turn around and disappear any time soon.
I wouldn't be suprised to see a franchise type airline sometime in the futrure. An airline where everything is contracted out to different carriers, everything from long-haul international, down to 50-100 mile hops.
As far as Chautauqua getting MCO from Comair. Chautauqua is cheaper for the fact they are flying not just 50 seat EMB-145's, but 37 seat EMB-135's. It fits more into DAL's designs of phasing out turbo-props. Flying a 135 is seemingly cheeper than flying either the 40 or 50 seat CRJ. It also fits the markets better. The 135 can also get in and out of EYW with a full load of people, which both the CRJ-200 and the CRJ-700 cannot do.
Just my two cents.
Last edited: