Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Do you use nitrogen?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Yes, Nitrogen has bigger molucles, less apdt to leak.
Hard to believe, but I have herd this from more than a few sources. Maby a good one for mythbusters.
 
pilothouston123 said:
Yes, Nitrogen has bigger molucles, less apdt to leak.
Hard to believe, but I have herd this from more than a few sources. Maby a good one for mythbusters.

I've heard that too, I've also heard the the effusion rate has nothing to do with molecule size, but molecule velocity in a gas (lighter molecule, higher velocity, pressure being equal), and also that it has to do not with velocity, but how the gas interacts wth the membrane. I'm not sure whath e real answer is, but everyone seems to agree that nitrogen will escape more slowly. I haven't, however seen any real hard data on how much more slowly it escapes than air. remember, air is already mostly nitrogen (78%, I think, off the top of my head) so what is the real difference?

edit, I see the linked articles have some figures, nitrogen filled tires lose .7 psi/ month vs 2.7psi/month for air filled tires. So if you check your tire pressure every 2 weeks, that pretty much negates the advantage.
 
Last edited:
I'm almost 100% certain that small GA piston aircraft use normal air in their tires. I've heard of nitrogen being used in turbine aircraft (like a poster said above), but that's about it. The reason I heard was that the nitrogen won't explode in a hot brake situation, but that may simply be bogus.
 
Nitrogen freezes at a lower temperature. It also retains a constant pressure over large temperature changes. On top of that it does not contain moisture, unlike the ambient outside air. If outside air is pumped into an aircraft that flies above the freezing level, the moisture within the air will freeze inside the tire. This can cause an imbalance or corrosion.

Also, aircraft tires are designed to resist nitrogen permeation though the carcass.
 
Last edited:
The_Russian said:
On top of that it does not contain moisture, unlike the ambient outside air.

That's the explanation I was given by a mechanic for using nitrogen instead of "normal" air.
 
The unfortunate demise of a Mexicana B727-264 in March 1986 (XA-MEM) illustrates the problem. See aviation-safety.net website
 
I prefer helium. It allows you to takeoff at slower speeds but it's a bitch in the flare.:nuts:
 
Nitrogen is inert, it will not burn, also it is less corrosive than regular air because of the moisture issues and because it is inert. Bigger Molecules, Seriously, Come On. Bigger molecules? WTF!

P.S. All of you with bigger molecules go get me a bucket of propwash and some flight line.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top