Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DL CFO says he may explore sale of Comair

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Halo_RJdriver said:
Why not choke up on your scope and forbid any regional like rah and meza and the rest of us going over 70 seats. If I were a DAL or any other mainline pilot I would detest seeing mesa or chiniquwa flying anything bigger than a 70 seat plane.
How can you with your strong stance on scope even dare to mention the likes of mesa?

Shaniguqwa isn't any better flying those ugly brasilia 180 out of SLC and their pilots calling those things guppy killers.

Scope those wankers back to where they belong. On the street behind DAL furloughees.

I have a good feeling that most (atleast 51%) will vote a big NO on any TA that allows for larger RJs at DCI. Those planes would eventually replace our 737-200s and maybe MD88s on some routes. We should get 100 seaters or even 79 seaters (like E175--Air Canada mainline flies them) to do the replacement flying.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
..."(like E175--Air Canada mainline flies them)...."


The only reason that AC flies the EMB175 is that a mediator/arbitrator made it a condition of allowing the CRJ705 to be operated by Air Canada Jazz (ALPA). EMB175's were never part of the original fleet order from Embraer.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom