DELTA'S SCOPE RELIEF AND THE 717's?

[Golden Falcon]

And for every regional jet that gets "scoped out" 5 of those crews flow to mainline....

 

[BILL LUMBERG]

There will be plenty of movement and hiring due to the TA, and 148 50 seat RJs retired.


Bye Bye---General Lee

Gotta debate you on this fact General.....

Highly doubtful this will trigger hiring....too many givebacks in "flexibility" for our workrules counters the whole argument.

 

[180ToTheMarker]

That number is not very representative. Yes, 44% of airframes but what percentage of seats? Or seat miles. Not that I'm arguing for more RJs just pointing out the error of your calculations.

44% of cockpit seats.

 

[Hamfighter]

I spoke to Scrappy one-on-one after the meeting yesterday (silly nickname, but I feel the most articulate, well-spoken and likable of the group). I said, "If the success of Delta is based on having these 70+ seat RJ's..."
He finished my sentence: "then why don't we fly them?"
He said they actually presented that to management on this TA, but that it it just not economically feasible for us to fly anything smaller than 88 seats because it would cost to much for Delta pilots, fa's and mechanics.
Again, don't like it, but it makes sense.

 

[RJ Bum]

It is unacceptable. While in no way softening on the scope stance, it did make sense how Scrappy explained it at the meeting yesterday. Delta has these long leases on the 50's that they can't terminate, but they can convert to 70s or 90s and it costs to much to just park them until the leases expire.

Sounds like a management problem. Just sayin...

 

[General Lee]

I spoke to Scrappy one-on-one after the meeting yesterday (silly nickname, but I feel the most articulate, well-spoken and likable of the group). I said, "If the success of Delta is based on having these 70+ seat RJ's..."
He finished my sentence: "then why don't we fly them?"
He said they actually presented that to management on this TA, but that it it just not economically feasible for us to fly anything smaller than 88 seats because it would cost to much for Delta pilots, fa's and mechanics.
Again, don't like it, but it makes sense.

Neither do I, but I can recognize, along with you and some others, that this is a business, and the regionals are getting squeezed to produce more for less compensation. Colgan had to give up their big props because United wanted it done for less. Instead, cap the number and include a ratio that gives mainline the edge.

Bill Lumberg,

The productivity gains via the reserve rules have a Q&A on the Dalpa website that answers some of the supposed "myths" about those new rules. There are two very busy months of the year, July and August, and those two months are what Delta staffs for. The rest of the year DL is over staffed. Until capacity is brought back up, the airline will continue to be so. Hopefully a couple hundred guys will take the early outs, which will help a bit.


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[waveflyer]

What's so magical about 88 seats??

It doesn't make sense until they show the numbers-

And again- do you guys realize you're selling out regional pilots, whipsawing them against each other to keep wages artificially low, stealing any leverage they may ever have- giving them the "choice" of quit your career or show up and chase the mainline carrot for less?

 

[waveflyer]

Guess what?
I also saw an NBC report on how American made just a few hundred dollars per perfectly executed 767 flight.

No RJ has ever made a profit.

Didn't you guys see how quickly Independence burned through cash with the economics of the RJ.
The -900 is better, but not that much-

It's the network that makes the money. It's all of it in total. The miles. The credit card deals. Funneling passengers onto larger jets that wouldn't make the trip at all if that feed were lost. Delta's business plan does not include making a profit on every single leg flown. It's about working it all to make a profit on the entire very powerful network.

Again, if it's a deal breaker for mainline pilots to fly an aircraft that big- DALPA ought to say no.

Imagine how united has managed to survive without letting go of -900's yet.

If you do this DALPA, you'll make it very hard for them and AA to keep up their scope fight.

 

[BILL LUMBERG]

I spoke to Scrappy one-on-one after the meeting yesterday (silly nickname, but I feel the most articulate, well-spoken and likable of the group). I said, "If the success of Delta is based on having these 70+ seat RJ's..."
He finished my sentence: "then why don't we fly them?"
He said they actually presented that to management on this TA, but that it it just not economically feasible for us to fly anything smaller than 88 seats because it would cost to much for Delta pilots, fa's and mechanics.
Again, don't like it, but it makes sense.

Joe Kolshak was standing in my cockpit drowning us with his wisdom right after we did TA 46 and the RJ rates appeared on our payscales. So I asked, "when are the big RJs coming to mainline Joe?".....He said "I know this is emotional and yes you sure did come down on your costs but do you know what a Flight Attendant makes at Comair, or a mechanic at ASA?....much cheaper than Mainline.....you have to think economically, it's not just your costs..."

Scrappy, (like the guy) sounds like he's stealing that talking point from the spinmaster himself.......our NC needs to stop defending the status quo and start being our agents for change.

 

[Mookie]

44% of cockpit seats.

which is by far the most germane fact to this whole argument. good luck DAL dudes.

mookie