Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta's Future

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

f9driver

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Posts
74
FWIW

Delta's future?
I was hoping to see something addressing the ACA FRJ situation, but its interesting none the less.
____________________________________




Comments from a furloughed Delta pilot who attended a road show
meeting.
They are going on with all employee groups at all stations.

Don


Subject: Grinstein Meeting at DFW
To All:


The following is simply my view of the presentation that Gerald
Grinstein
made to the pilot group at DFW on 3/17/04.



First off, the man looks good for 71, he carries himself more like
someone
who is 10 years his junior. At no time during the 2-hour meeting did
he
dance around any of the questions, if fact he was refreshingly up front
with
some difficult topics. He started with the fact that he was not here
to
negotiate with us, and in fact he did not do that. Is what he did do
was
paint a picture of the current situation at Delta. Not any new
revelations
here, most of the stuff I had in fact heard before. His thoughts on
where
the industry as a whole is going were interesting. I think he’s been
around, very sharp whenever talking negatively about the
previous/current
management team; he always did so in a very professional manner. Also
made
a comment about trying to maintain/assemble a management team. The man
also
has a sense of humor and will use an occasional four-letter word. The
following are the points that I remember from the meeting, I did not
take
notes, this is from memory so don’t hold me to specifics.





Ø In 5-6 years he thinks there will be 2 hub and spoke airlines
around.
One of them will probably be AA, he hopes that Delta is the other.



Ø Consolidation will take place between the "Network" carriers.



Ø DAL no longer has the ability to borrow money. Even if we could
borrow money he would not want to assume more debt as our current debt
is at
a dangerous level.



Ø Due to our inability to borrow we are no longer able to hedge
fuel at
a reasonable rate. Don't quote me but something along the lines of
costing
DAL $130 million just to hedge now.



Ø In the coming months our liquidity will start to dramatically
decrease.



Ø Pre-911 Delta was worth more than AA, now we are worth about the
same
as AirTran and Skywest! Acknowledged that this is management’s fault
for
wasting away the best balance sheet of the “Network” carriers.



Ø A question was asked in nature about our large number of RJ's in
use
and the fact that DAL is still going to lose $400 million for the 1st
quarter. He said that in 03' the RJ's were in fact profitable for DAL.



Ø He thinks the future of DAL is with the 757/767 fleet. And in
fact
the future of hub and spoke airlines is going to be with larger
aircraft,
not the 100 seat market. Just my opinion in trying to read between the
lines. With the growing of the LCC segment in the industry we will
never be
able to get our cost down close to SWA, AT or JBLU on the short haul
markets. He did mention with the larger aircraft we could gain an
advantage
on the cost per seat mile.



Ø Delta might get an 8-10% pricing premium over the LCC’s, not the
20-30%??? we had in the past.



Ø LCC’s in combination with the internet pricing has changed the
industry forever.



Ø The traditional up-turn down-turn cycle will no longer exist.
Not
sure what he meant by that? I think that the profits in the good times
will
not be able to cover the losses in the bad times as they have before.
That’
s a guess.



Ø He said that he will take responsibility for hiring LEO and that
it
was not the right thing to do. He mentioned that in the future Mngt.
should
come from within.



Ø Said that he and Fred Reid had philosophical differences on how
the
airline should be run. I picked up another comment like that about
Fred as
well.



Ø One pilot mentioned how bad our marketing dept. was. Mr.
Grinstein
said that he has looked at marketing and that the necessary changes
are/will
be made. Again, he didn’t throw any stones at the marketing team, just
indicated that changes would be made.



Ø He is fundamentally against the airline within an airline
concept.
Wants more info. On Song before making a decision on it.



Ø On his watch there will not be any Exec. Bonuses. Etc.
Mentioned
something about some of the people leaving requested more $$ to stay,
he
refused, and said he wants people who want to work for Delta.



Ø With pay concessions and work rules combined we will be looking
at
about 40% pay cut.



Ø Does not have a problem with keeping Delta pilots the highest
paid in
the industry.



Ø One pilot made the comment that even if we give the “30% plus”
it won
’t do any good unless management has a clear plan. He replied that he
is
aware of that and cited US Airways; and then replied that we will see
his
plan in the future.



Ø When asked why not accept the current position of the union and
get
the benefit of pay cuts now. He replied that Delta has suffered a
heart
attack and that aspirin will not fix it. DAL needs major repair work.
If
DAL cannot get cost in line before the next downturn we are in big
trouble;
in that case, a 15% pay cut would not be adequate.



Ø Wanted to know if the union would go back to the saying of C01’
“United plus” as he is more than willing to give us UAL plus 1% right
now.
That was actually a well-delivered joke on his part.



Ø When asked what time period would they be looking at Bankruptcy?
He
replied that he would not tell us that but assured us that ALPA knows
exactly when it is.



Ø Said that management needs to be reduced in size.



Ø Other work groups have had work rule, benefit changes that make
them
competitive with groups from other airlines and therefore they will not
take
pay cuts.



I’m sure I’m forgetting lots. I really did get the impression that he
was
not trying to sell anything and that he wanted the pilots to know what
the
company is facing. He approached everything with a very matter of fact
attitude, not emotional at any time if someone threw a dagger at him.
At
the end of the presentation the number of pilots who spoke up and said
that
they felt better after hearing him speak surprised me. Certainly was a
sobering meeting. He never made any guarantees that Delta will come
out of
this ok, only that he would “fight like hell to keep us out of
bankruptcy”.
Although I certainly did not agree with everything he said, I think
that he
will do everything he can for this company. If anyone has the
opportunity
to hear him I would strongly suggest attending one of his meetings.
Don’t
let me or anyone else shape your decisions, stay informed and make your
own.
So from someone who has not had faith in either Management or
ALPA………………I
trust him.
 
Geez

I thought things were improving. The inability to borrow money to buy fuel futures (hedge fuel) will cause the losses to pile up this summer. Looks really ugly from the cheap seats.
Hey General, your boss says the RJs are profitable. So which is it?
 
Flaps30,

He said they WERE profitable(in 2003). Then he said that we need larger aircraft than 100 seaters (there go your 100 seaters ASA and Comair...Bu--bye)

Well, I wasn't there, and I don't know what will happen. I just don't see a 30% straight pay cut plus benies equalling another 10% passing a vote. He is trying to "manage our expectations"---and I am sure DALPA does know what really is going on. But, in fact, no one really does know what will happen in the future. As far as the fuel hedging goes--I am sure we could afford it--since we had that $325 million bond sale and then we sold the hedging for the rest of the year for an $83 million profit. Either he knows something that we don't about the future price of oil---or somebody over there made a big mistake.

AS far as the phrase "An asprin won't help a heart attack"---actually, you are supposed to take an asprin immediately when you think you are having a heart attack---it thins your blood and can help out until the paramedics arrive. That really is a bad analogy---he needs a new one.

I hopefully have 21 more years at this company, and I want to keep flying here. I hope they some how come to an agreement eventually, and I will accept a pay cut as long as Dalpa signs off on it. Let's hope they know what is going on....

Bye Bye---General Lee;) :rolleyes:
 
Respectfully,
The 100 seaters were NEVER coming to ASA or Comair General.
I think as far as the hedging goes, someone blew it. Also, why would you think ALPA "knows exactly what is going on"? Do they have someone on the inside over at Virgina Ave? It seems to me that unless ALPA is over there every day in ALL of the meetings they could not possibly know all. It would be great of course to have the big picture though. I sure wish there was a video or audio tape of the meeting to pass out to all. Appears to be a bit bleak from what I got out of it. I hope you have all 21 years and most of them in the other seat. I just wish all 3 pilot groups would finally drop all the BS, meet, get a few pitchers going and hammer out something beneficial for all. Then go to GG and work it out as well. JMHO.
 
Grinstein is a smart negotiator. He knows that he has to set high expectations for cuts so that he can get an "acceptable" range of cuts after negotiating.

Plus, if the situation were absolutely DIRE, then all bets would be "off" and all labor groups would be contributing something... My Delta buddies agree that cuts will be necessary but the degree of cuts is debatable... What monetary incentives does Grinstein have to cut costs deeper and deeper?
 
ATR-drivr,

Sure, I wish that we could all sit down and hammer it out too---and I know we would take the lion's share of the cuts, but I don't see that happening right now. I believe Dalpa had a copy of "the books" and made it's decision of the original 13.5% on those "books"---but of course I was not there.... Sure, things are changing rapidly it seems, and the media sure likes to jump on the band wagon and even Wall St. wants cuts---they are never PRO-LABOR. I also wonder who makes the fuel hedging decisions, and it sounds like Grinstein is making excuses for someone who sold out too early. (I can only assume that--I don't really know....) One thing is for sure----the pressure is on.

Bye Bye---General Lee:rolleyes:
 
General, he said that aspirin won't fix a heart attack, not help it. Although your right about the aspirin thing, it still won't fix it, so it is a good analogy.
 
rgd,

Sure it will. The first thing you do when you have a heart attack is to take an aspirin---and we could say that giving $400 million a year in savings now could heal it----but more from everyone else could really fix it. The asprin and heart attack thing is a bad analogy.

Bye Bye--General Lee;)
 
I respect your observations most of the time, but, in this case General Lee, I've got to agree with RJD. Aspirin will not fix a heart attack. The majority of heart attacks are ischemic events. In other words, a continuous lack of oxygen to that particular part of the heart muscle tissue has caused that specific area of heart muscle tissue to die off. The lack of O2 may be caused by arterial, venal or capillary blockages. The attack, the pain, is in essence, a dying muscle's spasm.

Aspirin may thin the blood, which may serve to relieve a certain amount of fluid pressure in the heart blood vessels. That serves to reduce possible pain and shock trauma to the overall heart muscle during the event. That may also serve to keep blood flowing to the region, but aspirin does not cause any additional O2 to be delivered to the heart; O2 being the only real cure for a heart attack. The problem ultimately is that particular area of muscle tissue cannot receive any O2 because it is already dead. The heart remains damaged despite the momentary lessening of discomfort aspirin affords.

Therefore, the ruling on the field stands--the analogy is still good.
 
ATR-DRIVR said:
Respectfully,
The 100 seaters were NEVER coming to ASA or Comair General.

I just wish all 3 pilot groups would finally drop all the BS, meet, get a few pitchers going and hammer out something beneficial for all. Then go to GG and work it out as well. JMHO.
ATR : I though we had 100 seaters on the property when you hired in. I did not miss it by that much....

The analysis that ASA's management team made on the 100 seater made logical sense to me. That the break even point between the RJ's and the larger airplanes happened at the 150 seat level. Otherwise the enhanced efficiency of the 100 seat jets were not made up by the extra expense of providing one gate per airplane. Apparently three, or four, airplanes per gate is a real cost saver, although I can sure see why passengers hate carrying their bags up and down stairs, then having to schlemp past noisy APU's, power carts and ATR's waiting to park. I mean, the airline provides hearing protection to ramp workers, what about the passengers?

As far as all three pilot groups hammering out a deal, your union has prohibited your MEC from representing you to Delta. So the limit of our negotiating power is being able to go to dinner with the Delta guys and beg them to go to Delta management - and some how I don't think ASA pilots' interests is the Delta MEC's top priority at the moment.

The only reason the Delta MEC is playing nice with the ASA MEC, instead of just taking our jobs and putting us out on furlough like our friends at ALG, PSA, PDT, is that the RJDC action could be rendered moot by a deal between our MEC's. After all, if our representatives vote for it, it is hard to sustain a failure of fiar representation claim - isn't it!

So, like it or not, the RJDC ensuring judicial review of what ever the Delta MEC might do actually provides motivation for the three MEC's to come together and work together towards a solution.

And no, we don't want them drinking beer together - (BOD hospitality rooms). I've been around some of those guys drunk and the arrogance, combined with an absolute distain for non military regional pilots takes a cool head to navigate around. Given that we have absolutely no negotiating power I want my guys well read, well rested and sober when they walk into that room.

We are right, we also must be smart....

~~~^~~~
 
Last edited:
The problem is that this heart attack requires more than just targeting one unionized labor group - regardless of their cost. Reducing pilot pay alone won't cut it... How about a clearer strategy going forward (i.e., Song vs. mainline)? How about REVENUE ENHANCEMENT? How about ACCOUNTABILITY from management? How about a fleet plan that is realistic (100 seaters might be appropriate to replace the 737-200s)?

It is too easy to always focus on the one unionized labor group.
 
On Your Six said:
The problem is that this heart attack requires more than just targeting one unionized labor group - regardless of their cost. Reducing pilot pay alone won't cut it... How about a clearer strategy going forward (i.e., Song vs. mainline)? How about REVENUE ENHANCEMENT? How about ACCOUNTABILITY from management? How about a fleet plan that is realistic (100 seaters might be appropriate to replace the 737-200s)?

It is too easy to always focus on the one unionized labor group.

Labor is one of the largest costs for any airline, pilot's in particular, and Delta's pilots specifically. Therefore, you can expect them to go after that.

A clearer strategy? The current management team is taking over and determining that. It does seem as if they want to stop the expansion of Song, probably curtail it, and quite possibly eliminate it.

Revenue Enhancement? Not much chance of that with LCC's (in particular AirTran and JetBlue) setting the fares.

Fleet Plan? I read the same passage and came to the conclusion that the CEO wouldn't mind seeing the 100 seaters at DCI. Bad for DALPA, good for ASA/Comair, probably good for Delta Airlines, Inc as a whole. And no, ACA doesn't have a dog in that fight so I am just observing from the outside.
 
Did anyone ask GG why Delta is giving away 135 MILLION f*cking dollars to women in aviation when they are bleeding like a stuffed pig? Curious to see how he dances around that question........
 
46driver,

Well, the last management team had a strategy that isn't working so well. Great job hiring McKinsey for $5-10 million dollars to develop a mediocre strategy - that was money well spent (Leo is ex-McKinsey and probably was helping his consulting friends pay off their Rolls Royces). How much did Delta spend on consultants and auditors last year? THAT IS A GOOD QUESTION given the poor results...

Revenue enhancement in this context refers to better yield management. Cost is only one side of the equation. Perhaps better frequency needed on the most popular routes or maybe better aligning fleet type to the route. These are just general suggestions but they should not be overlooked - I bet DAL management can do better in this regard.

Don't expect the regionals to be flying anything more than 70 seats due to scope issues - that's what I hear from my Delta buddies. That is a non-issue.

Sure, Grinstein will focus hard on the pilot group because it does constitute a high cost. But that should not be the sole focus like he makes it out to be. I agree with Heavy Set, if things were SO DIRE then many, many more changes would be required (like USAirways)...

The DAL pilots are NOT the sole cause of Delta's current situation - that should be remembered...
 
The asprin analogy is ok I guess, but still asprin is usually the first thing you should take when having a heart attack. I still think we should give them a boost right now, instead of giving them the "farm." I think the approach the NW guys are taking is the correct one--via an "investment." I hope Dalpa is looking into this and something is hammered out soon.

Fins and 46 driver,

There is no way Dalpa will "willingly" give up 100 seaters to DCI--especially with 1060 furloughs on the street. They would probably just lower the wages like the "Delta Express" deal. Don't get too excited....

I'm off on a 2 day. Enjoy guys!

Bye Bye--General Lee:rolleyes:
 
General,
No reason for me to get excited - I don't fly for Comair or ASA so the 100 seaters don't apply to us. ACA's future with Delta is tenous at best.

On your six,
Those were just my observations. Hope Delta pulls outa this. Growing up in the South, Delta was always the "hometown" airline and I want to see y'all prosper.

Best of Luck.
 
General Lee said:
Flaps30,

He said they WERE profitable(in 2003). Then he said that we need larger aircraft than 100 seaters (there go your 100 seaters ASA and Comair...Bu--bye)

:

General, I was there. And reading between the lines, what I took away from the comment about the 100 seaters is that he thinks the future of the mainline is in larger aircraft, but he would be more than happy to have DCI flying a 100 seater.
 
Well, too bad it won't happen for awhile. No way Dalpa would give that up with 1060 on the street. Sad but true. I guess our 737-200s will be our 100 seater for now.....

Bye Bye--General Lee:rolleyes:
 
Paid for 100 seat -200s are a lot better than trying to swing financing for Barbie Jets with a downgraded bond outlook. Even if they burn a couple hundred more pounds per hour.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top