XRMEFLYER
Semi-Turgid Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2003
- Posts
- 453
Well there you have it! If he said it to the press and it was printed in the papers, then it HAS to come true doesn't it? Never any BS to be found in the paper!General Lee said:RJCAP,
He stated that exactly in the SLC "Jerry's kids" meeting he had with all of the SLC employees--not just the pilots. A lot of the other employees---ticket counter people etc--(many flew in from the Montana stations--like Bozeman) were concerned about the RJ growth--even though the loads are there to support 737s. (the reason the 737s aren't there is because Delta found other additional routes for them apparently---like extra to MSP, DTW, and ORD from SLC) Since we parked all of the 727s--we don't have many extra 110-140 seat aircraft left.
X-ream-me,
Sure, he could have been stating what we "wanted to hear", but he also stated that to the press---and I think I posted that article stating Grinstein didn't think people wanted to fly on RJs longer than 2 1/2 hours (he said 2 hours to the SLC people, and 2 1/2 to the press). Face it, the passengers are back in "numbers", it's just the fares are half. We need to have a cost reduction, and part of that will come from Dalpa and creditors....
Bye Bye--General Lee
Yes the load factors are higher and I hope that you get your wish with regard to the mainline growth again. It would be good for all of us.
As for your repeated public pleas for x to ream you, that stuff may be the standard at mainline, but I don't swing like that!