Why is the E170 'far more comfortable' than any CRJ?
Comfort is nice and all, but does it really affect the bottom line? Doubtful in these times.
This guy is CORRECT!!
Give me a break. Have you EVER flown in an E170? Have you? It is far more comfortable than any CRJ I have ever flown in. What's up with the low windows in the CRJ? Every time I sit on the window I end up hurting my neck as I attempt to look outside. You basically have to sit on the aisle to not hurt your neck while looking out the window. Most business passengers (seem like the only people who can afford flying these days) hate the lack of bin space and often the inability to use their computers inflight (tight seating space) in the CRJs - just ask them... I am sure most business pax would prefer to fly Southwest or AirTran when given the option vs. a CRJ-200/700/900 on a competing route. A 717 is far more comfortable.
The E170 is like a mini-Airbus. Very comfortable with great bins and huge windows in comparison. I'd venture to say that E170s are more comfortable than coach in most big airliners. The CRJ is not comfortable at all. The ERJs suck too in the back. An E170 is as comfortable as a 717 for pax if not a little better.
As far as economics are concerned, sure, the CR9 is probably slightly more economical. But it still has the feel of an RJ vs. the feel of a mini-Airbus in the E170. Regardless, the E170/175 has better economics than anything but the CR9 and it clearly beats other slightly bigger airliners like DC9s and 737-500s from an operational cost standpoint (even though NWA's DC9s are paid off - yada yada yada). The E190 is even better from a cost standpoint.
Simply put, ask passengers who have flown both the CR9 and the E170 and the vast majority will select an E170 any time. I would in a heartbeat. CRJs are just not comfortable for medium to long distance flights.
CRJs/ERJs can be used effectively on non-competing routes when passengers have NO other choice but to fly on it. CRJ-200s/ERJs should not be used on routes where they compete with LCCs like SWA or AirTran or Jet Blue because you cannot spread the operational costs over 50 seats and still charge competitive LCC fares. Not every passenger is an international feed passenger...[/quote]
Just ask ANY Mesaba AVRO driver how much the comfort factor played into keeping that airplane around. I can tell you from ecperience that the AVRO was MUCH!! more comfortable than your your E170 series airplane, and certainly more comfortable than the CRj900, yet I find myself flying around the CRJ900, the AVRO replacement...so your logic is flawed if the deciding factor on keeping an aircraft is comfort, airlines would provide us with our own DAY JET.
SORRY but FUEL is the name of the game and the Mesaba CRJ's are beating the COMPASS E175 by 12%-20%