Delta operating out of ATL vs. DFW, why?

BigPappa

Name is Mitch Buchannon
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Posts
367
Total Time
Mucho!
What are your thoughts? It seems to me that operating out of DFW as a HUB could be a lot more efficient for Delta as compared to operating out of ATL.
Some reasons:

1. Any (small shower) weather in ATL seems to affect departing and arriving traffic all the time. Seems like you just can't leave or arrive on time. All this causes significant reduction in reliable air-travel for ATL pax. DFW never really seemed to have that much trouble handling traffic. DFW weather is VFR 90% of time.

2. For Domestic Ops DFW would be more attractive as a HUB as it is centrally located so one can cover East and West Coast flying from this central point which should save on fuel expenditures.

These two points seem like important factors to me.

What do you think?
 
Last edited:

Hair-on-Fire

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Posts
614
Total Time
10,000
Because there's another little airline at DFW that has somthing to say about it......
 

BigPappa

Name is Mitch Buchannon
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Posts
367
Total Time
Mucho!
Be more specific. If you are talking about competition, this would be fair game at any location. We are in the USA you know. There is competition out of ATL too. This is why you make your product better!
 

IAHERJ

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2002
Posts
930
Total Time
hmmm?
Due to gate space restrictions, DAL would be a smaller hub carrier than AA for the foreseeable future. With higher CASM and a smaller route structure through DFW, it wouldn'd (in fact didn't) make sense. Why not concentrate on your stronger hubs (as they did) and spread out geographically (as they did) and focus on international (money making) destinations(as they are trying to do). In ATL, they are the AA. The history of the airline placed ATL as it's headquarters and the site of it's largest hub. I know what you are getting at with regards to DFW being a better airport/hub etc. but AMR staked it's claim on DFW from the get go and you can't just turn history around. The only hub with two major competitors is ORD and I have know idea who carries the most pax through there between UAL and AA but I'd venutre to guess it is UAL.

IAHERJ
 

viper548

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2004
Posts
2,090
Total Time
6800
ATL is a better location for north-south traffic on the east coast but I agree that DFW would be a good hub for other ops. DEN would be a good location too, but too close to SLC
 
Top