In defense of General Lee, I must admit that while unabashedly pro-Delta, he normally discusses issues with fact and without too much emotion. Usually, anyway.

In all cases, however, he never ascribes to a military rank.
Rather, he just likes the vision of Daisy Duke leaning on his "hood."
More to the point, FDJ2, I would only comment that the current situation does not equate to the days of deregulation, thus all of the lessons from
Hard Landings do not apply.
Specifically, the rise of LCCs (in terms of percentage of total passengers conveyed) are doubly troubling. They not only siphon off certain travelers who would have traveled on a mainline carrier, but they do so with a different cost structure. De-regulation, while leading to the rise of short-lived non-traditional carriers, was truly fought in the trenches of the mainline carriers.
The environment has changed, probably permanently.
In any case, market forces take on numerous dynamics. From an economics standpoint, downward pressure on revenue will undoubtedly lead to decreased compensation for certain labor categories
if and only if that compensation is deemed "elastic."
Wage elasticity depends on many variables, including union dynamics, labor law, availability of trained and capable replacements, desired corporate culture, and individual acceptance.
The question is clear. Does Delta's survival depend on pilot concessions? If so, when will the parties involved actually stop dancing around the issue and resolve the problem?