capt_zman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2001
- Posts
- 462
Beautiful touchdown on 4R, PF checks the brakes on rollout, applies reversers, rollout is going well, then all of the sudden, the brakes lockup (I'm assuming) to make the 33R intersection. Plane actually starts hopping down the runway. Pax are treated to the beautiful smell of burnt rubber and plane leaning to the starboard side. Capt comes over speaker before the gate and says we have a brake smoking and that we need to have the fire personnel check it out before parking. All is well, but one of the right mains is blown.
This got me to thinking about longer runways and landing performance. I've flown with many who apply max reverse and just about max braking to make the shorter landing distances and I've flown with many who apply smooth reverse and smooth braking and use the available runway (considering long runways, not short). What is everyone's SOP on this. I'm one of the guys who believes in making it as smooth as possible and don't mind turning off at the last 1/3 of a runway (traffic permitting).
Just wondering, because the Delta flight today had another high speed turnoff about another 500-1000 ft down the runway, and it seems as if this was completely avoidable.
Z-
This got me to thinking about longer runways and landing performance. I've flown with many who apply max reverse and just about max braking to make the shorter landing distances and I've flown with many who apply smooth reverse and smooth braking and use the available runway (considering long runways, not short). What is everyone's SOP on this. I'm one of the guys who believes in making it as smooth as possible and don't mind turning off at the last 1/3 of a runway (traffic permitting).
Just wondering, because the Delta flight today had another high speed turnoff about another 500-1000 ft down the runway, and it seems as if this was completely avoidable.
Z-