spinproof
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2002
- Posts
- 774
Yes. I will agree that certain actions were dismissed. Thoses actions were in conflict to class action. They were monetary in nature and were based on individual claims. Ford,et al.FDJ2 said:The judge recommended class action not based on the merits, but rather as the best use of court resources. IOW, he only wants to hear similar claims once. He does not want to revisit the issue again with a different batch of similarly situated plaintiffs. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the merits, or lack thereof of the RJDC claims. Spinroof, you seem full of nothing but spin, completely unable to back up your claims. Can we at least agree that 90% of the RJDC claims, which included six claims seeking monetary damages in the billions were summarily dismissed?
The main case however is all that's important and continues in class action status! Since discovery continues at a snails pace perpetuated by ALPAs attorneys, several motions by the defense(ALPA) have been denied. I refer to those actions and not the preliminaries.
If court resources and not LAW was the determining issue for law suit status
all trials would be held at Krispy Kremes and have misdeameanor status!
TIC-TIC-TIC_...........
