Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta 767 that landed on taxiway at KATL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Iceman540

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Posts
13
Just curious if anyone has heard the outcome of this one? Is there a thread already on this? If so, could someone kindly shoot me a pointer to it?

Merry Christmas!
 
The Thread You Could Have Search For

DAL 767 lands taxiway M at ATL (
multipage.gif
1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page)
Ticker



10-29-2009 21:47
by doh
182 12,664 Majors
 
I understand they had a medical emergency so they could have landed on the ramp and been fine as far as the punishment is concerned, right?

Sorry to use the word "punishment" - I worked for CAL for too long.
 
The crew was honest and forthright from the get go. There were a number of things that went wrong that morning but the crew did the right thing my not making up any kinda story. They'll likely be able to ASAP the deal.
 
I understand they had a medical emergency so they could have landed on the ramp and been fine as far as the punishment is concerned, right?

Sorry to use the word "punishment" - I worked for CAL for too long.


As long as it wasn't intentional....
 
The crew was honest and forthright from the get go. There were a number of things that went wrong that morning but the crew did the right thing my not making up any kinda story. They'll likely be able to ASAP the deal.


Not to mention there were a number of other instances of aircraft almost doing the same thing under the same sidestep situation under the same lighting and airport configuration conditions.

They were retrained and have been back on the line for a month or so now.
 
Was departing with a crewmember that was known to be sick intentional?

Like I said before, if this event got the same scrutiny that others have, their outcome may have been a lot different.


After the actual facts of the situation were reviewed by flight ops, the faa, and alpa... it was determined to not be intentional.

I've heard about 3 different stories in regards to the guy that got sick... still don't know which one to believe. The people that had the facts and the actual reports were the ones that determined it to not be an intentional violation. So what does that tell you?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top