Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

dealing with a POI.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

scubabri

Junior Mint
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
550
Does anyone have any experience in dealing with an unreasonable, old school POI?

Our poi refuses to let us use CTS, refuses to allow credit for training at another company, and a few other issues that he is just wrong on.

The CTS thing is a big thing. Anyone have recommendations?

sb
 
scubabri

scubabri said:
Does anyone have any experience in dealing with an unreasonable, old school POI?

Our poi refuses to let us use CTS, refuses to allow credit for training at another company, and a few other issues that he is just wrong on.

The CTS thing is a big thing. Anyone have recommendations?

sb
I would have to agree with your inspector on the CTS training.Anyone who has ever gone through that training has alot of time sitting in front of a computer and has learned nothing.The only advantage is it saves time and money for the company on the training of there pilots.I would recommend having a training officer do the required training for your operation.
 
Last edited:
First of all become very familar with FAA Order 8400.10. When you correspond with the POI always reference the section of the 8400.10 down to the sub-paragraph , if necessary. Always communicate with him in writing. If you do communicate verbally, always follow up with a note to him confirming the conversation. Always, but ALWAYS, keep 'Memos for Record'. Preferably type written in some form. Signed and dated. It is also a good idea to hand write personal notes to yourself about the meeting on this memo. Your feeliongs, thoughts, etc.

Have you asked him what his problems are with your requests? They might be quite valid. Then ask him how he suggests you accomplish the required items and how to use these materials. Sometimes they can be helpful. Sometimes they can be just d---heads.

A couple more questions. First how long has this guy been with the FAA and as a POI? Are you a fairly new operation? Have you expanded a great deal recently?

Many of the items are POI optional. If the new pilot's training was in house, the POI's generally will not accept it. Exceptions are if both companies are using the same computer based training program or Flight Safety from the same approved facilities.

One note on the CTS. It can not be the complete training program. As the program is not complete enough to meet the 135 training requirements in its entirity. So you would still a day or two of ground training.

If you still are having problems, get your ducks lined up, know what the real status of your POI is and request a meeting with his supervisor to discuss your concerns and issues. But you will need to have all the facts together. Also remember that supervisors are generally promoted to the level of their incompentence or to put them in a position where they can't do much damage. A last resort would be to request a new POI.

Good luck.
 
Rick1128 said everything I would. I can emphasize the 8400.10. It is a welath of information and is the POI bible. The CTS and accepted training issues are getting handed down from HQ. Many POIs won't accept training unless training was completed at the same facility (FSI, Simuflite). Online training is coming around, but the FAA just isn't satisfied yet. Ask CTS for documentation that others have approval using the program. Rick is also correct in sying that it can't be your full program. Still need to cover Company specific items.
 
POI's

Dealing with any POI can be a challenge at times. If you disagree with his/her viewpoint request the source of their guidance on that subject. Their opinions need to be respected but actions can only be sustained with guidance in the written form. It is always easier to develop a relationship that moves forward with your POI where you make a request and qoute the actual guidance that permits the activity. Remember he/she is protecting their job and hopefully trying to do the right thing. Make it easy for them to understand your viewpoint and always have a solution that can be quoted as a win/win situation from the inspectors viewpoint.
 
does anyone know where I can get a full PDF version of the 8400.10? The FAA has it broken up on their web page.

Also, where can I get a PDF copy of the FAR/AIM?

sb
 
It seems that the 8400.10 is "guidance" and "direction" that there are no hard and fast rules that a POI must adhear to in a lot of situations. Training curriculums seem to be one of those areas.

Basically is seems that the POI is a little dictator and that he/she can make stuff up as they go. I guess getting stuff in writing is the only way to deal with them.

sb
 
scubabri said:
It seems that the 8400.10 is "guidance" and "direction" that there are no hard and fast rules that a POI must adhear to in a lot of situations. Training curriculums seem to be one of those areas.

Basically is seems that the POI is a little dictator and that he/she can make stuff up as they go. I guess getting stuff in writing is the only way to deal with them.

sb

Verbal Agreements are worth the paper they are written on.
 
scubabri said:
Does anyone have any experience in dealing with an unreasonable, old school POI?

Our poi refuses to let us use CTS, refuses to allow credit for training at another company, and a few other issues that he is just wrong on.

The CTS thing is a big thing. Anyone have recommendations?

sb

Buy him a bottle of 12 yr old Scotch
 
FAA Handboks are guidance. However, trying to have the argument with a inspector that it is not rule willl not get you anywhere. The handbooks tell them how to complete their job. Thus unless you submit in a fashion that lines up with the handbook and they can see the way to the next step, you will get nowhere.

Down side is very simple items can be a real death march when the guidance in followed to the letter. The certification process, adding of new aircraft or privileges to a certificate holder (especially those with validation testing) or initial issuance to a applicant certificate is the slowest and most frustrating regarding the handbooks.

Upside, if you submit in accordance with the rule and guidance, they really cant say no....unless you have acted like a tool, and now they dont like you, then they will have to give it to eventually, but they can make sure the delay is murder.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top