~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Vortilon :
I would hope you are right, but indications are otherwise.
The Delta MEC is picking their words very carefully and new words like "constituencies" and "stakeholders" cover negotiatings involving employees that are not represented by the Delta MEC, yet are having their jobs negotiated by the Pilots' union.
With the ongoing litigation, the Delta MEC is not going to come right out and say that "we will take their jobs and burn them to the ground." Instead I think that once a back room deal is made it will be forced on the ASA and Comair MEC's as "take it, or the airplanes will be diverted to a new certificate." Then ALPA's defense will be that the ASA and Comair MECs actually voted for it.
You might find this hard to believe, but I want to see the Delta pilots recalled and the company succeed. But, the best way to accomplish this is to end ALPA apartied - instead it appears ALPA's negotiations are sticking to the same formulas that failed elsewhere in the industry.
I would hope you are right, but indications are otherwise.
The Delta MEC is picking their words very carefully and new words like "constituencies" and "stakeholders" cover negotiatings involving employees that are not represented by the Delta MEC, yet are having their jobs negotiated by the Pilots' union.
With the ongoing litigation, the Delta MEC is not going to come right out and say that "we will take their jobs and burn them to the ground." Instead I think that once a back room deal is made it will be forced on the ASA and Comair MEC's as "take it, or the airplanes will be diverted to a new certificate." Then ALPA's defense will be that the ASA and Comair MECs actually voted for it.
You might find this hard to believe, but I want to see the Delta pilots recalled and the company succeed. But, the best way to accomplish this is to end ALPA apartied - instead it appears ALPA's negotiations are sticking to the same formulas that failed elsewhere in the industry.
Last edited: