Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DAL/NWA SLI Progress

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Wasnt part of the agreement with Mgmt not to have fences? Other than the time between DCC and SOC of course.
 
Noserider:

FDJ2 can fact check me on this, but I think it depends on the table positions each respective group brings to the negotiation.

The nature of arbitration is that they tend to "split the baby up the middle." If one side wants a ten year fence and the other side wants no fence, the result might be a five year fence.

You bring up management's involvement and that is a good point. As far as I know management will not be at the table in this arbitration. However, there may be some advance agreement with management that we are not privy to.

Thanks dude.
 
Wasnt part of the agreement with Mgmt not to have fences? Other than the time between DCC and SOC of course.

It wasn't in the JPWA, and any side agreement that wasn't disclosed to membership would be a big problem, I think. I also can't imagine any arbitrator being tied to what management wants.
 
A negotiated agreement would still be possible if the arbitrator causes both sides to fear his decision even more than a compromise deal. I'm not sure how he can do that, unless he telegraphs a different message to each team. :smash:

Except that is arbitrators like three...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom