Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DAL & NWA JPWA Vote

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Fins(a.k.a John Breiling),

Are you still trying to stir the pot? Why are you representing yourself as a Delta pilot? Just for the record Ransome was stapled with many restrictions.

Ed
 
Fins(a.k.a J*** B******),

Are you still trying to stir the pot? Why are you representing yourself as a Delta pilot? Just for the record Ransome was stapled with many restrictions.

Ed

"Ed"---while you're posting people's full names (or who you are accusing them of being anyway), why don't you go ahead and post YOUR full name tough guy?
 
In order to achieve large contractual gains we need two things, a strong and profitable company and a unified pilot group. Neither the Delta pilots or NWA pilots have that today. We need to get there.

This JCBA gives us all the best chance to get there in the shortest time.

This isn't about kumbaya and playing nice with each other, not that there is anything wrong with that, this is a business decision which happens to be a win-win-win for all of us.

The best furlough protection you can have is a profitable and growing airline, by capturing the value of this merger sooner, rather than later, it gives us all the best opportunity to work for a growing and profitable airline.

I don't see any cons to this JCBA, it provides equity for all of us, contract improvements and parity for all, and a superior SLI process agreement that gives us all the best chance to achieve a fair and equitable seniority list.

No other pilot group has ever accomplished what the DAL/NWA pilots have on the front end of a merger. Just my 2 cents.

Great Post!! Agree 100%
 
Fins(a.k.a John Breiling),

Are you still trying to stir the pot? Why are you representing yourself as a Delta pilot? Just for the record Ransome was stapled with many restrictions.

Ed
Special Ed,

Congratulations, you scored 25%. The embarassing part for you is that nearly 100% of the folks on this board know the answer to 3 out of 4 statements that you boned up.

You are correct about Ransome and I think it serves as a model for one way that Delta pilots could take back their flying and make their scope stronger.
 
Last edited:
peanuckle said:
It pains me seeing the jumbo RJ's running around all the airports that both DAL and NWA have given up in recent years.

superpilot92 said:
I see that also, why is that? Completely short-sighted IMHO. SCOPE is extremely important and needs to be captured asap.

You two weren't singing this tune when you were RJ pilots!

But now that you're ex-RJ pilots, and now mainline drivers, you scream bloody murder about RJ flying and scope.
 
I said the same thing when i was an "RJ" pilot so your attempted flame is worthless. Your embarrassing yourself by acting like a crybaby.:bawling:
 
I said the same thing when i was an "RJ" pilot so your attempted flame is worthless.

I'm sure you did. I'm sure you did, indeed!

And the second your regional job would have been threatened by scope, you would have raised bloody he!! like none other.

Your embarrassing yourself by acting like a crybaby.:bawling:

Hahaha, funny. :D
 
I'm sure you did. I'm sure you did, indeed!

And the second your regional job would have been threatened by scope, you would have raised bloody he!! like none other. Wrong, i always pushed for CAL to keep the 50 seat scope language. Next :cool:



Hahaha, funny What are you the grammar police:rolleyes: .


Why have you suddenly flooded the NWA and DAL threads spreading you BS? :cool:
 
You two weren't singing this tune when you were RJ pilots!

But now that you're ex-RJ pilots, and now mainline drivers, you scream bloody murder about RJ flying and scope.


Actually, I was singing that tune when I was an RJ pilot. It always ticked me off flying with guys foaming at the mouth over getting 76 seaters. They would always get a lecture on why the larger the airplanes the regionals fly, the fewer top tier jobs there will be.
 
Actually, I was singing that tune when I was an RJ pilot. It always ticked me off flying with guys foaming at the mouth over getting 76 seaters. They would always get a lecture on why the larger the airplanes the regionals fly, the fewer top tier jobs there will be.

Remind me again which pilot group allowed Compass to be formed?

Keep in mind that Mesaba getting 36 new CRJ-900s is simply a replacement for the 69 seat Avros they used to have. So, there is no 'net' change for the "large" RJs at Mesaba.

As far as Pinnacle goes, to this date, they fly only 50 seat CRJs for NWA.

Which brings us to Compass..... explain to me who (which group) 'okayed' Compass to exist and the terms of its existence? Hint... not Pinnacle, not Mesaba.......
 
Last edited:
Economically, the Avro was irrelevant. The CRJ900 is a DC9 slayer.

Compass is an alpa sanctioned alter-ego. That should be NWA/DAL flying.
 
Last edited:
You two weren't singing this tune when you were RJ pilots!

But now that you're ex-RJ pilots, and now mainline drivers, you scream bloody murder about RJ flying and scope.

I don't know Superpilot, but I've known PeanuckleCRJ for several years. His opinions about RJs have always been the same. Just because you fly an RJ doesn't mean you have to agree with the outsourcing bulls---.
 
That should be NWA/DAL flying.

Careful you once were a "RJ" pilot and saying such things will get you a crybaby post from Flamer1015. :bawling:

Alot of us have continually spoken out about not allowing any further outsourcing of flying to the regionals, even when we were at the the regionals, and for whatever reason that just chaps Flamer1015's a$$. Why is that Flamer? :angryfire

I find it ironic that as soon as the new contract got voted on he flooded the NWA/DAL topics with his flames.:cool:
 
Last edited:
I don't know Superpilot, but I've known PeanuckleCRJ for several years. His opinions about RJs have always been the same. Just because you fly an RJ doesn't mean you have to agree with the outsourcing bulls---.

Agreed and I assure you I have always had the same stance. When i was with XJT i was always a proponent of CAL keeping their 50 seat scope limitation even though that meant XJT couldn't at the time get bigger planes. The more flying that is farmed out the less amount of jobs there are at the Majors meaning less positions for everyone, including flyer1015.

The majors should have put it ALL on one ticket to begin with and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Had that been done it would have meant higher career earnings for ALL pilots and quicker longevity rises on the mainline pay-scales. If your not part of solution your part of the problem.
 
The majors should have put it ALL on one ticket to begin with and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Had that been done it would have meant higher career earnings for ALL pilots and quicker longevity rises on the mainline pay-scales.

Ahhhhhhhhhh, finally something I agree with 100%. You can search my previous thread history if you wish to see exactly my point regarding this outsourcing back in the 90s when the RJs first came out.

I like you now.
 
Ahhhhhhhhhh, finally something I agree with 100%. You can search my previous thread history if you wish to see exactly my point regarding this outsourcing back in the 90s when the RJs first came out.

I like you now.

Thats been my stance all along which is why i dont know why you pitched a fit about anything i said previously. Glad we are on the same page now. Carry on ;)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top