Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

CPL above 12,500lbs

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
igneousy2 said:
Not old enough?
Not experienced enough?
Not enough moral character?

later :)


Igneousy2,
Mostly not enough moral character........ :D

But seriously, he is not 23 year-old yet.

I have also read that to operate under FAR91 subpart K, a PIC needs ATP.

Am I right to say that if we were to take the aircraft across the pond to England, he would not be able to fly as PIC?

I vaguely remember that the UKCAA has a PIC requirement of ATP for aircraft above 12,500lbs.
 
Last edited:
turbosheep said:
I have also read that to operate under FAR91 subpart K, a PIC needs ATP.

Hmmm....yep, yer right, there it is right there, 91.1053(a)(2)(i).
Subpart K, that's Fractional Owernership - never looked at it before. It's another kind of control of quasi-commercial operations, not regular part 91.

So, if it is a fractional owned airplane over 12,500, yep ya gotta have it, but if it's a regular registered airplane, I think the JAA requirement is for a JAA licensed pilot, but not a U.S.licensed pilot under regular part 61 and 91.
 
To the best of my recollection:



Part 91: Private or Commercial (depending on operation) for anything regardless of size or type of engine. Unless you are talking Subpart K, which I know nothing about.

Part 135 PIC:

ANY Jet pax-carrying operations (under or over 12,500#) requires ATP
Any Prop over 12,500# requires ATP for pax-carrying operations

Jet or prop cargo-only - Commercial

Prop meaning turbine or recip.


Part 121 PIC:

ATP for anything regardless of engine type or size.
 
turbosheep said:
Thank you everyone.

What I meant was, is holding a CPL good enough to operate a multi-engine jet above 12,500lbs as PIC?

If not, does the person need to hold an ATPL?

Else a PPL holder can be PIC on a 747, provided the flight is not flown for compensation or hire and that he/she has a type rating. :)
Who the hell is Else, your wife or your husband? And if he/she is neither, but both, I'd be suspecting he/she's medical, more than he/she's ability to PPL PIC on a 747.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom