Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Correct terminology - "Go Missed" or "Begin the Missed Approach"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
UndauntedFlyer said:
Seems as though in the last 10 years or so I have begun to hear the term "Go Missed" meaning the begining of a missed approach procedure on an IFR approach procedrue. Before that it was always "Execute the Missed" or "Start the Miss" or something like that.

My question is where did the "GO Missed" come from. Personally I think it sounds like "teen talk."
I think it's usually "F*&K or GD, dangit" followed by TOGA and flap retraction. Either way, not the norm to go missed.
 
Last edited:
Had FAA in jumpseat on 727 on R30 localizer approach MIA descending from MDA when wx went woxof about 300 ft, just said going around, FO said missed approach and 20 minutes later came back and landed without any problem. No problem.
 
smellthejeta said:
With a picture of Marian in front of you, no doubt.

While she's holding a copy of the FARs? Marian's a little monkey woman she is!

This is a very intriguing post. I think we have a legitimate case here to bring the Radio Operator position back aboard the aircraft and let him worry about phraseology.
 
Capt bubbers 44

Who is this guy with the gun that posts he talks to Center when doing approaches?
He was just clarifying as to who we are directing the statement to, ATC or cockpit.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top