Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, that's a technical question. The definitive answer will come not from "some guy on the internet" or even a lawyer, but from a judge. But if I were a betting man, I would think it would come down to who received the primary benefit of you having been through recurrent training. Your old company would probably make the argument that you being current is what made you employable to another company, and therefore had value. Your lawyer, on the other hand, might counter by saying that the certification you received ("Pt 135/121 recurrency check") was applicable only to your previous employers operations, and that it holds no value to you outside that enviornment. I'm sure there's case law on this, but even case law would be subject to some interpretation by the judge.What about companies that make you sign for recurrent training? I've heard of a few doing this, and to many pilots, unexpectedly.
That's easy to say untill you are out of work, got a wife and two kids at home. a morgage, two car payments, and all the rest of the bills you have. then signing a paper is not that hard to do. but it will not keep me from finding a new and hopefully better job.