Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Commutes unlikely to be addressed in new rules on pilot fatigue

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I've been displaced to a new domicile with 30 days notice and only 4 days off allowed between trips in the two domiciles. Any new rule would have to address this. Companies would have to incur costs in moving displaced pilots and giving them time off. Net result would be airline mgts not being able to move pilots around in knee jerk fashion. It's a win/win scenario for pilots, really. That's one reason they won't do anything.


And that is why they will not address commuting. Management is not willing to give up the "flexibility".
 
How can the airline enforce or make sure you would be in base with in 8 or 10 hours prior?? Make us go to the airport sign in 8 or 10 hours prior to reporting?? or make us wear GPS tracking device?? The whole thing about fatigue when you start your trip 1st day is that WE have to be responsible to get a good night of sleep. If we have to commute in the night before we start a trip if we commute or go to bed at a descent time if we live in base, that has to be a common sense rule but I cant see how they could really make it enforceable when there would be just too many variables envolved in making a rule that would work
 
Last edited:
How can the airline enforce or make sure you would be in base with in 8 or 10 hours prior?? Make us go to the airport sign in 8 or 10 hours prior to reporting?? call in a secured GPS phone line or make us wear GPS tracking device?? The whole thing about fatigue when you start your trip 1st day is that WE have to be responsible to get a good night of sleep. If we have to commute in the night before we start a trip if we commute or go to bed at a descent time if we live in base, that has to a common senese rule but I cant see how they could really make it a enforceable.

With driving, no. But if you commute in on a Part 121 carrier, the company and the FAA can easily track your movement if commuting on your own airline, or on another air carrier. I'd just be a matter of a software mod to compare your air commute with sign-in time, and flag any violation of standard they come up with.

With probably 40% of pilots commuting, the FAA and the airline managements don't want ask the question because they know they can't stand the answer.
 
Last edited:
A junior pilot at a regional, or even a first year new hire at UAL or anywhere else can't afford to be buying hotel rooms 4-6 times per month, especially if ASSIGNED bases such as LA or NYC. Move there? And live where, in a trailer park, by the river, or in some slum apartment?

I've commuted to crash in the crew room, at hotels, and on the airplane or in the airport. The first day is hard, but ok if you rest when finally at the layover...
The solution is positive-space commute in, and a reasonable first-year salary that would allow a few hotel rooms if needed.....hell, ual still makes new-hires (07, 08) buy hotel rooms in training. Even my regional paid for my hotel room.....

This is a problem management and alpa should solve...
 
How can the airline enforce or make sure you would be in base with in 8 or 10 hours prior?? Make us go to the airport sign in 8 or 10 hours prior to reporting?? or make us wear GPS tracking device?? The whole thing about fatigue when you start your trip 1st day is that WE have to be responsible to get a good night of sleep. If we have to commute in the night before we start a trip if we commute or go to bed at a descent time if we live in base, that has to be a common sense rule but I cant see how they could really make it enforceable when there would be just too many variables envolved in making a rule that would work

Like most of the rules already in place, I could see it just being enforced after the fact. Just like the self certification for medical fitness for duty, they would set it up to be self certified. Then it won't cost the airlines a thing. The full responsibility would be on the pilot. If you get hit by one of those kamikazee tugs at ATL or CVG then, they will look at your past and pull your cell phone location info to see if you were in compliance. Same old, same old.
 
AND... Consider the whole concept of dead heading to get around what would what otherwise be more than an 8 hr day or the crew rest seat on an international flight. In either case considered rest. What is the difference between one of these seats and the seat occupied by a commuting pilot. If commutes were to be addressed by the government it would this not have to be looked at as well?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom