Timebuilder
Entrepreneur
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 4,625
??? American manufacturing is driven off by its own greed and lack of responsibility to the very communities that built them.
Actually, the shareholders, and that includes every little old lady with an income mutual fund, demanded that the American businesses remain profitable. This profitability is the source of a company's ability to hire poeple and to issue dividends to investors.
"Greed" is a term aplied by socialists to ANY profit making institution. It is those profit making institutions that have made America one of earth's greatest nations. If we lose that, America is lost.
"Those pesky and annoying minimum wage and environmental laws..... let's just move to some third world country
I see this long sentence starts with quotation marks, but it is not attributed to anyone. Is this your way of putting words in the mouth of some imaginary capitalist? That's my guess, at least.
Let the market dictate public policy, yeah , let's put the chickens in charge of the chicken feed.
I see you pasted a quote, yet failed to read or at least understand what was quoted. America is a place where the people, or "the chickens" if you prefer, are in charge of everything. Liberals don't like the idea of the people being in charge of anything. They see themselves as the only reasonable, compassionate, sufficiently intelligent life on the planet. They are their own aristocracy. Let's review.
The better solution would have been to trust the free market, and use common sense when writing laws that affect our jobs. Of course, when you are a university professor or a politician, your job won't leave when manufacturing is driven off to Maylaysia.
The free market is the bedrock of American business, so it must have worked pretty well for a long time. There have always been scoundrels among us, and we need to have a legal framwork to keep them in check, to be sure. That's why we need the second half of the first sentence, "and use common sense when writing laws that affect our jobs."
This is a clear case of the NIMBY effect. You see it when someone wants to open or expand a landfill, or start a quarry business on a piece of land they have purchased. "Not in MY back yard, you don't!!" "Put it somewhere else" is the cry. We have managed to put our businesses "somewhere else".
In this case, we made it untenable through various welfare programs, wage dictates, and environmental restrictions for businesses to remain profitable here, but we still want to wear those sneakers and jeans. Now, it's all in someone else's backyard, and the various interest groups are happy. We are still bleeding factories to countries that are more "user friendly" every day.
Apparently, our environmentalists are not nearly as concerned about what happens in someone else's backyard as they were about their own. And they still put on those sneakers and jeans.
If this trend continues unchecked, we will soon have so few jobs that we will become another also-ran, socialist country with 79% percent income tax, a six week wait to see a doctor, two months guaranteed vacations, and a populace with no spirit or drive.
That's not America. I think we need to make some positive change that makes America more competitive. Not socialism, not communism.
We need to save American capitalism.
Last edited: