really?
MetroSheriff said:
Only by virtue of signing a contract before the bottom fell out of the industry. Which, by looking at your profile, you were not around for.
So its OKAY for
everyone else
after 9/11 to ink an inferior contract, but Comair is expected to remain where they were because we signed a "pre 9/11" contract?
So the market is so bad that you
can't sign a Comair plus or even Comair break even contract, but the market is at the same time more than good enough to maintain the Comair contract
at Comair only? Don't think that's how it works.
You can't have it both ways. Either Comair pilots got scared and gave some up, themselves doing what almost every other regional piot group since then has done,
or Comair pilots were forced to recognise market forces and settle for a "Comair minus" contract, just like most all other regional carriers.
So, which is it? You could argue that we got scared because of market forces (and the behavior of every other pilot group) and lowered an otherwise sustainable benchmark, but in doing so you will have admitted that the numerous other carriers who have bargained after us also settled for less than was sustainable. That's what I think happened.
But you can't scream about Comair doing what every other regional out there has done, for the exact same reasons.
Take the speeding analogy. Comair is doing 65 in a 55. Everyone is pulling us over and giving us tickets. Although its questionable, even bogus, to get a ticket for such a minor excess in speed, we know we are guilty and accept the fine. Others have been doing 95 on the same road for years, at night in the rain running red lights. We have complained about that and tried to get more patrols of that road. Now we are caught breaking the law and all the other speeders driving by are taking delite in the irony of it all. Fine, we did the wrong thing for the wrong reasons. But so have you been doing the wrong thing, actually a lot worse, for a lot longer. See you in traffic court.