Comair exit poll

[InclusiveScope]

PCL - thank you for stating the obvious. I think you are wrong on the facts, but very correct in the political fall out.

Perhaps getting a fleet guarantee was "inclusive scopes" inclusive scope. I dunno - wish he would explain what he is thinking.

No the fleet guarantee isn't "inclusive scope". It is scope however and it is a beginning for the CMR pilots. Remember, scope is important. The first step to putting this genie back in the bottle is to stop the outsourcing from going any further. The best contract in the world isn't Woerth the paper it is written on if you don't have job security.

Why is it bad when the Delta MEC does it and their pilots ratify it, but OK when the Comair MEC does it and their pilots ratify it?

As for the litigation, the Comair pilots are looking much less like victims and much more like predators. Politics do matter and those on the moral high ground better start defending their positions.

The current environment is "eat or be eaten". It isn't a good environment, but that is the way it is. Maybe if we belonged to a real union, we could stop it. This loose association however is doomed.

 

[PCL_128]

There is the difference between you and me. My job doesn't belong to ALPA, or the Delta MEC, or the Delta pilots. It belongs to me. You have bought into the master/apprentice concept of your job and to the "brand scope" BS from Herndon.

No, the difference between you and me is that I understand my job and you don't. I understand that I work for a company that does contract work for another airline. We don't do our own flying, we do Northwest's flying. The NWA pilots don't own my job, but they do own the NW code flying. Until Pinnacle starts flying under our own code (never gonna happen), then the flying is all controlled by NWA pilots and rightfully so.

What makes you think that you somehow have claim to any flying? The DL code doesn't belong to Comair, it belongs to Delta. As such, it is subject to the DAL PWA. You get the flying that the Delta pilots allow you to have. Nothing less, nothing more. If you don't like that, then go get a job at an airline that does their own flying. Until then, stop your whining and quit trying to bankrupt my union.

 

[KingAirKiddo]

It's the job security, stupid. Plain and simple. This LOA does set up a minimum fleet guarantee which secures the futures of everyone on the list right now, as well as everyone expected to be hired as a result of the growth.

 

[av8tor4239]

Management does not "reward" pilots by buying new airplanes. They buy and aquire new aircraft in order to increase their revenues and profits, the more aircraft flying, the more money an airline makes (as long as there is demand for them). Delta has determined the demand and need for more regional jets, namely 70-seaters. They have already inked a deal with CHQ, allowing CHQ to operate 16 EMB 170's. These aircraft are to be put into service slowly over the next 2 years. This is all that CHQ can afford and logistically put into service. Also, there is a limit to how much flying can be flown for Delta because of their other airline affiliations. In other words, CHQ will not be getting any more jets for Delta for a while. Also, ASA has already got their allotment of orders and logistically cannot receive more at the present time. That leaves Comair. Delta needs Comair to operate more jets, and they will get them.

Comair can aquire new aircraft and will make a nice profit on each one they operate, no matter that the pilots make a little more than others. However, Delta/Comair have been trying to lower their labor costs for a long time, in order to make even more profit. Lowering the labor costs at Comair will, in turn, lower their labor costs at ASA and allow them to demand cheaper contracts from other airline partners.

A deal between Delta and Comair has probably been already made, just not made publicly, although Embraer's stock has already gone up due to an imminent order from Delta/Comair. But, before officially making this deal, they figure why not try to get concessions from the pilots (and FA's) first. They figure pilots will think in order to get new airplanes, they must lower their pay; in other words, fool them. Delta/Comair will get concessions, the planes will come, and everybody will be happy. This way Delta/Comair can kill two birds with one stone: They get new airplanes to increase their revenue, and get a lower labor cost structure from Comair and all their airline partners.

You state that companies don't sit idle, they grow. You're right, and Comair will grow because they are a critical part of Delta's system. Comair has had the highest paid pilots for a long time now, and has been receiving new aircraft and making a nice profit. Currently, they have no aircraft on order, and everyone else does, so logically it is Comair's turn. Delta wants more regional jets and needs Comair to fly them, thus they will get them. Delta is not going to just never allot more aircraft to Comair and allow them to stagnate and not be as profitable as they can be.

Don't you find it strange that Comair already has developed an exact timetable to get new jets? Bottom line, Comair is slated for new jets, and will get them in order to remain profitable to Delta, and they are just using this need for jets and have developed a timetable to trick Comair pilots into thinking they must take concessions in order to actually get them.

Your words are music to my ears!!! Best well written post in 18 pages of post! Thank you

 

[PCL_128]

It's the job security, stupid. Plain and simple. This LOA does set up a minimum fleet guarantee which secures the futures of everyone on the list right now, as well as everyone expected to be hired as a result of the growth.

Oh yeah? Hey DAL737FO and TKBane, how'd those job protection clauses in the DAL contract work out for you guys after 9/11? There are several thousand furloughed pilots out there right now that can explain to you how well these job protection clauses work. If you think that you can assure jobs through concessions then you're dreaming. I can guarantee you that the final language in the LOA will allow some sort of force majeur provisions that make it all but useless. But why am I wasting my breath anyway? We all know that this has nothing to do with job security. It's all about GROWTH. Me, me, me! I want more and bigger airplanes!! Pathetic.

 

[~~~^~~~]

Inclusive Scope - Thank you for your posts.

 

[av8tor4239]

Can anyone post these 18 pages in the Comair Crew Room.. I will put them up in ATL on D and C.. I think Comair guys that have not voted yet sould read this stuff to cut through the Koolaid they have been fed..

 

[KingAirKiddo]

As one of the thousands of pilots who have been on the receiving end of a furlough notice in the post-9/11 era, it is about job security.

 

[BluDevAv8r]

Flying horses is the only person on this thread that uses objective logic to support his position. A $10 an hour operating cost difference does not matter one iota in the allocation of jets. Comair is getting the airplanes that are coming to them.

I have no clue if Comair is definitely getting these planes or not...but I would like to point one thing out here reference your above quote. $10/hour might not seem like a lot but lets take a closer look.

-199 jets at 10 hours per day of utilization = 726,350 hours per year for a fleet of that size

-$10/hour increase over that 726,350 hours = $7.3mm (assuming the total crew cost increase was $10 and not per pilot)

-Now we must multiply that number times 30% for reserve coverage, offline instructors, management pilots, etc which gives us $9.4mm

-Lastly we must multiply that number times another 27% or so for the fringe benefit cost associated with such increase (such as medical, social security, medicare, yada yada) which gives us $12mm of increased cost.

-Now this doesn't assume that over time the higher rates will geometrically increase and roll up faster and higher than the lower rate...so there is some cost built in there as well.

-It also assumes that the $10/hour was distributed between both the CA and FO. If it was $10/hour for FO's and $10/hour for CA's, then we are talking equivalently higher costs as well.

So is $12 million per year (probably more actually) enough to sway an aircraft purchase order? I don't know. But $12 million isn't chump change...especially when one considers that the airline they feed is in severe cost cutting mode. Lastly, this analysis is a big-time wag...done on the back of a napkin. My guess is that the number above ($12mm) is lower than what it really is to be perfectly honest. Of course, that assumes a $10/hour total crew cost change.

-Neal

 

[~~~^~~~]

Neal - $10 might be high, but for arguement's sake:

12,000,000
1,500,000,000 = .008

(This is a little higher than figure quoted in the CVG Enquirer, but close enough to add validity )

Yes, less than 1% is chump change. ​

That is the reason why pilots can't buy airplanes. ​

Comair is getting whatever airplanes it was going to get anyway.​

ALPA has an excellent economic analysis department, but they tend not to use the resource when it would give them data contrary to something that they want to do anyway.

The RJDC did write the Comair MEC reminding ( and asking them ) to get economic analysis and asking them to get independent legal counsel when they reviewed management's proposal. ( My faith is coming back ) Perhaps it would have made a difference.

Now consider a dollar a gallon increase in gas - 133 airplanes * 3,600 hours a year * 515 gallons per hour ( average of the 200 & 700 ) = $246,582,000.

$246,582,000
$1,500,000,000 = .16 More than 16%!

Here you have the reason why Fred Buttrell's justification falls short, on an economic basis. So you have to accept that either Fred is writing checks he can not cash, or this is simply a moral victory for management and ALPA.

And Neal - thank you for supporting your contract effort. After Comair's concessions I think you guys are #1 in the industry after seeing another thread. ASA will be there soon