Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Coffins Corner

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

pudz100

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Posts
3
Can somebody help me out with the term "coffins corner"? I have no idea what it relates to or even how it is defined. Any idea where I might be able to research this?
 
Backside of the power curve. Takes more more power to fly, no altitude to trade for airspeed, "headed for the coffin."
 
It has to do with high-altitude operations.
Stall speeds increase with altitude and the speed of sound decreases with altitude, thus leaving a narrow airspeed range between the Stall Buffet and Mach Buffet. If you slow down, you can encounter the Stall Buffet. If you speed up, you may encounter the Mach Buffet. To get out of it you must descend at a constant safe airspeed within this narrow range.

I think i'm right on all of this, but if not i'm sure someone will correct me.

If you have a Turbine Pilot's Flight Manual, I think there is a paragraph on it.
 
...which for something like the U2 at high altitude was about an 8 knot difference between stall and overspeed / mach tuck.
 
willbav8r said:
...which for something like the U2 at high altitude was about an 8 knot difference between stall and overspeed / mach tuck.
Wow that is close to my 310, 7 knot difference.:D :D
usc
 
Football

Also in football,

A punt that goes out of bounds inside the 5 yard line is said to be in the coffin corner, or the killer corner.
 
Junk

Also, in Residential Organization, I have a corner in my living room where if I throw something into it (the Coffin Corner, or Junk Corner), the chances are good that it won't come back for a very long time.
 
NoPlaneNoGain said:
It has to do with high-altitude operations.
Stall speeds increase with altitude and the speed of sound decreases with altitude, thus leaving a narrow airspeed range between the Stall Buffet and Mach Buffet. If you slow down, you can encounter the Stall Buffet. If you speed up, you may encounter the Mach Buffet. To get out of it you must descend at a constant safe airspeed within this narrow range.
This is exactly correct.
 
Falcon Capt

I like your avatar. Every time I see any of the airframes in the Falcon series, I know that "perfection is French".

Hope you're having fun with it.
 
"...and the Speed of sound decreases with altitude..."

Not exactly, but close enough. Acutally, Mach is dependent on a formula more complex than needed here, but (in our normal atmosphere) the variables are actually more or less constant--except for temperature.

If you enjoy math, take a gander at a summary of the equation
here.

In short, the only thing that affects mach for any altitude is temperature. Since the temp at 36K (that crazy tropopause) is quite low, Mach will occur at a lower indicated airspeed.

What was mentioned earlier about indicated airspeed creeping ever closer to an stall speed with increased altitude is correct.
 
It should also be noted that "coffin corner" exists much higher than civil aircraft can go. The envelope for any civil aircaft at maximum certificated altitude is still quite large.
 
avbug said:
It should also be noted that "coffin corner" exists much higher than civil aircraft can go. The envelope for any civil aircaft at maximum certificated altitude is still quite large.

Actually, the Lear series may not have as tight of an envelope as some military fighters; it can still get pretty darn close. In fact, I first heard the phrase when referring to the Lear 23 and 24. Then again, how close is close? If I recall correctly there isn't an actual convergence of the two speeds in a Lear, but you darn sure had to respect that little baby when you were going fast up high. It’s all a matter of perspective.
Respectfully,

JayDub
 
The real coffin corner

Actually the coffin corner is the one corner in the hangar where they put a plane that some poor turd bought and didnt realize how much it would run him to reannual the thing! Our coffin coner has been occupied by a 182 for the past two years!
 
Actually, the Lear series may not have as tight of an envelope as some military fighters;
If an aircraft can safely exceed Mach 1 (as most modern military fighters that can reach such altitudes can), then the upper end of the "coffin" isn't really there. It's a problem for airframes that have an upper limit defined by some fraction of the speed of sound.

Civil aircraft don't have anything like the narrow range of the U-2, but it absolutely does become a factor for a heavy aircraft climbing to its max ceiling. The example that comes obviously to mind is the 737-700, which displays both upper (Mach buffet) and lower (minimum margin above stall buffet -- I think it assumes some G load, either for bank or turbulence or a combination of both) limits on the Mach/AirSpeed Indicator. At high altitudes & heavy weights, the arc that is NOT yellow or red can get pretty small, and strong mountain wave or turbulence becomes severe no-fun. Descend a couple thousand feet & the available variance in speed opens way up.

If I can find a good picture of the MASI I'll post the link, just for grins.

Cheers!
 
Indeed, if you have a halfway decent book on aviation aerodynamics it will show an example of the so-called coffin corner envelope.

the parabolic figure it describes will also move inwards when you start putting a certain load on the airframe. the coffin corner itself might not be such a big deal in normal cruise. It will make both margins, high speed and lower speed quite a bit smaller when you encounter some turbulence, for example if you have a load factor of 1.3g's on the airframe your 15 knots margin might now be a 2 knot margin, or leave you outside the coffincorner.

I believe this effect was firstly really "developed" when the spitfires has enough power to reach high altitudes and when they started pulling combatmanoeuvres they ended outside this envelope.
 
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?...C0zMA==&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=&static=yes&size=L

Scroll to the right of the picture & look at the left side of the PFD, you can see both the hash marks at the high end of the speed tape, and at the low end. The caption says the picture was taken at FL 400, and since there is about 40 knots split between the top & bottom, they can't have been so heavy as to be at max weight for the altitude; the range can be somewhat narower than that. Of course, as was pointed out, in jets like the U-2, the range gets really small; let's not go there!

Snoopy
 
willbav8r said:
...which for something like the U2 at high altitude was about an 8 knot difference between stall and overspeed / mach tuck.

I don't think the U2 had a problem with Mach tuck, as this phenomenon occurs primarily on swept wings as the center of pressure moves aft rapidly. The U2 doesn't have a swept wing, and while the CP moves aft as speed increases, its not nearly as violent as in a swept wing aircraft....Most airplanes need to be trimmed as they accelerate because the CP is moving aft, but Mach tuck is what happens when you run out of trim.

As an aside, I just saw a NASA TR-1 (U-2 without the cameras) here in BGR for a couple weeks in DEC...it was doing some atmospheric research.
 
Last edited:
JayDub said:
Actually, the Lear series may not have as tight of an envelope as some military fighters; it can still get pretty darn close. In fact, I first heard the phrase when referring to the Lear 23 and 24. Then again, how close is close? If I recall correctly there isn't an actual convergence of the two speeds in a Lear, but you darn sure had to respect that little baby when you were going fast up high. It’s all a matter of perspective.
Respectfully,

JayDub

JayDub, I think that Avbug is correct. Even for the Lears, coffin corner is a long way away as long as you stay in the certified operating envelope.

You are correct about the need for pilots to respect the airplane. The problem with early Lears had to do with stick force required to hold above/below trim speed. Simply put, they don't take nearly as much force at high speed to pull the wings/tail off as they do at low speed. Sorry, that wasn't simple, this should be; control feel was not linear and they are easy to overcontrol at high speed (very light in pitch). Take an untrained pilot who thinks that it is cool to go faster than barber pole, put him in an early lear and he may find himself falling from the sky minus his tail. But that scenario hasn't happened in about thirty years.

regards,
enigma
 
The reduction in force required to hold the aircraft off trimmed speed, below that required for certification, is why the Lear 35 has a limitation of .74 without the autopilot; it performs the mach trim function.

The lear, even at it's highest certified altitudes, doesn't come close to "coffin corner."
 
The U2 s surely did not have a problem with the coffin's corner! I saw '13 Days'. The way The U2 was able to crank and bank when under fire, Kevin Costern would never mislead me! Holywood should always be trusted! Why would they steer me wrong?
 
Enigma,

Thanks for clearing that up for me. Ahhh yes, having to pulse trim... the memories. I was told if you held the trim down in any one direction more than 2 seconds in a Lear, you were way behind. Take care and have a great weekend.

Respectfully,

JayDub
 
There are a coupla Singapore Airlines heavy drivers out there that could give you first hand accounts of their experiences climbing to max ceiling with max weight aircraft.

They have reduced "G" factors (so cleared to climb higher?), and have come unstuck on several occasions........
 
Most coffins have 4 of them. If you comply with the limitations of the aircraft that we fly today it does not exist.
 
It you want to talk 737 here is something interesting to do. The yellow buffets lines at say 410 represent buffet at 46 degrees of bank 1.3 G. If you want to see where the real buffet margins are just punch in a high ZFW in the FMC. You will see the yellow magenta lines come together but the red majenta lines that represent where you will fall out of the sky they will not move, they are determined by the angle of attack indicator plus all the other stuff going into the ADIRU's then to the FMC. The yellow stall wiskers come up also.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom