Avbug,
I have been jumping about 11 years myself. I currently jump a crossed-braced canopy with a wing-loading around 2.2 to 1. I do not consider myself a hotshot and although I like to swoop, I like to be very graceful with my landings. I usually initiate a 270 degree carving dive around 1000 feet if the area is clear, otherwise I will set-up for a straight in approach. If you think a dive is necessary to land, you are very wrong. My canopy has more flare straight-in than the big ones I used to jump 10 years ago due to its design. Thank God I got into the sport after the square canopy became widespread, otherwise my knees might have been destroyed. I agree with you that people downsize nowadays too quickly, but like everything else with the sport skill, knowledge of what you are doing, and ducking the complacency punch will keep you alive more than anything else. A student canopy can kill you if you fly it the wrong way too. Over the years, I have had 8 friends die skydiving and only 1 from a hookturn. The last annual fatality report I read had landings as one of the biggest pieces of the pie, but not the biggest. I know a few years back when the new canopies were introduced it was the biggest, but since then people have learned how to fly them better and safer.
Unfortunately, most skydivers don't understand the basic principles of flight and weather, especially green ones with around 500 jumps who start downsizing canopies. AFF teaches you only the basic survivor skills to freefall, open, and hopefully land safely. I have always had a problem with this since I was a pilot before a skydiver. Most skydivers in their first 5 years can't even tell you why the canopy flies and I see themselves set up for a landing that puts them into the most turbulent area of the dropzone. Why? They don't know any better.
I believe in Darwinism, especially with such a potentially dangerous sport like skydiving.
Blue Skies and Safe Landings (slow or fast)!