maddog805
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Posts
- 124
OK.....
posted by ERJpusher:
Dude we don't even have a real contract. None of us are safe.
posted by Tedstriker:
Was that my post in reply to the friendly gesture by China?
We have to keep things civil in the jumpseat I don't care who you work for. We all use this benefit. (freedom is excluded from this statement of course)
Yes Mesa IS the "enemy". But No MORE than CHQ. You guys (I'm mainly talking management) are in the same cesspool.
posted by Tedstriker:
Fine. This thread was about CHQ and ASA. I said hold out for ASA
posted by sf340flyer:
So did United, BUT they weren't company pilots yet. They were NEWHIRES in training. As far as I know CHQ was the only company to FIRE pilots, line pilots, pilots who had been flying for the company for a while.
For the record I have NEVER made a Mesa friendly post. I have made a few "friendly" posts to individual Mesa Pilots. I have a problem with the MANAGEMENT tactics of a few airlines (SkyWest at times) I rarely will flame a pilot GROUP, but if you search my posts I'm sure you will find a few times where I have. Oh well.
Every pilot group has made stupid decisions at times, but management makes them on a daily basis.
Now I'm not making sense to myself.
posted by ERJpusher:
ASAs contract is worded almost verbatim to ours on reduction of work force. And as far as yours, Maddog, I couldn't even find any reference to it in Skywest's contract. Are you sure you're protected? It might be a moot point for you since you have a respectible management team, but you never know...
Dude we don't even have a real contract. None of us are safe.
posted by Tedstriker:
This issue is hilarious. Maddog, I just read another post of yours about jumpseating that was very Mesa-friendly. Arent they the enemy too? My question is how did CHQ get to be the biggest problem in the industry?
Was that my post in reply to the friendly gesture by China?
We have to keep things civil in the jumpseat I don't care who you work for. We all use this benefit. (freedom is excluded from this statement of course)
Yes Mesa IS the "enemy". But No MORE than CHQ. You guys (I'm mainly talking management) are in the same cesspool.
posted by Tedstriker:
Our work rules are 10 times better than a lot of these companies.
Fine. This thread was about CHQ and ASA. I said hold out for ASA
posted by sf340flyer:
Chq wasn't the only airline to fire pilots. AA also fired all new hires still in training. It took almost a week for the Union to resolve that issue. Our Union took longer to resolve the issue. I'll tell your friends the same thing I tell the rehires that I fly with, If you hate CHQ so much go somewhere else.
So did United, BUT they weren't company pilots yet. They were NEWHIRES in training. As far as I know CHQ was the only company to FIRE pilots, line pilots, pilots who had been flying for the company for a while.
For the record I have NEVER made a Mesa friendly post. I have made a few "friendly" posts to individual Mesa Pilots. I have a problem with the MANAGEMENT tactics of a few airlines (SkyWest at times) I rarely will flame a pilot GROUP, but if you search my posts I'm sure you will find a few times where I have. Oh well.
Every pilot group has made stupid decisions at times, but management makes them on a daily basis.
Now I'm not making sense to myself.