Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Caught with his pants down. (CHQ)

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Now, now, ZJ...don't be Hermoine Grainger. Let some of the slower students have a chance.
 
That's some funny chit man!! Sounds like the bathroom door is more fortified than the flight deck door!! Guess they don't want those turds escaping!

SOME of the 145 doors are "sliders" and therefore not able to be "kicked out." The doors are BIGGER than the opening and they slide and collapse into a bulkhead.

How did a pax in the front hear the CA and NOBODY else did? The 145 is a long plane. There's an interphone in the back...why not just tell the pax to pick it up, hit "FD" and talk to the FO?
 
Because the capitano was an idiot and gave "the password" to a passenger. Talk about low IQ. Where do they get these guys? And the FO had to call dispatch holding above NYC with an insane situation. WTH.
 
Because the capitano was an idiot and gave "the password" to a passenger. Talk about low IQ. Where do they get these guys? And the FO had to call dispatch holding above NYC with an insane situation. WTH.

This is where the "whole person concept" and "experience" and "gut feeling" should come into play. However we have gotten to the point where the commuter industry is hiring pilots with NO experience in ANY job, including flying.

Some of my best decision making experience was made outside of aviation in previous jobs. I could get 3000 more hours of 121 multi turbine and it wouldnt equal the few years I spent in the real world workforce.

So get used to it, the pilots being hired today will be the ones facing situations they have never been trained on in the future. The question is, do their life experiences prepare them to handle it?

You can't measure every single factor in proper decision making. Especially in aviation.
 
Never been trained on? We're trained EVERY YEAR about security threat levels and proper responses. When the chips were down, NEITHER of these pilots responded correctly.
 
So get used to it, the pilots being hired today will be the ones facing situations they have never been trained on in the future. The question is, do their life experiences prepare them to handle it?

To use these two as the sample for the entire group of "pilots being hired today" is like using crews that land on taxiways as a sample for the entire make up of "pilots hired when you were hired."
 
So get used to it, the pilots being hired today will be the ones facing situations they have never been trained on in the future. The question is, do their life experiences prepare them to handle it?

You can't measure every single factor in proper decision making. Especially in aviation.

So how do we call an experience Delta 767 crew landing on a taxiway in ATL, and worst how bout the moron from midatlantic that will remember the restriction by putting the parking break handle to on while inflight!!!! do you care to know where the handle was a the time of touch down??? :/
 
So get used to it, the pilots being hired today will be the ones facing situations they have never been trained on in the future. The question is, do their life experiences prepare them to handle it?

You can't measure every single factor in proper decision making. Especially in aviation.

I go through training every year, but I have never been trained to a situation with one crew member stuck in the lav. So what? What's your point?

I don't see anything wrong with FOs actions. There was no immediate threat, so why not talk to ATC or to dispatch or to anybody else? They're there to assist you, right?

Nor you want to spiral down to a first grass strip within a gliding distance if you're not sure that there is an imminent threat to the a/c.

As far as Captain's actions, I don't really see anything wrong either. Imagine yourself stuck in the lav, unable to get out. There is friendly pax that tries to help, but you're still stuck there. What you do you do? You want to alert your crew, but they probably won't believe the passenger, right? They're in their fortress, peeking with suspicion through a peep hole. So you give him a password. What's the alternative?

So, before you convince yourself that your thousands of hours set you apart from regular folks (or the "regional guys"), look at the situation. It could happen that one day you will make an a$$ of yourself despite your experience. Has happened before, amigo.
 
Last edited:
I go through training every year, but I have never been trained to a situation with one crew member stuck in the lav. So what? What's your point?

I don't see anything wrong with FOs actions. There was no immediate threat, so why not talk to ATC or to dispatch or to anybody else? They're there to assist you, right?

Nor you want to spiral down to a first grass strip within a gliding distance if you're not sure that there is an imminent threat to the a/c.

As far as Captain's actions, I don't really see anything wrong either. Imagine yourself stuck in the lav, unable to get out. There is friendly pax that tries to help, but you're still stuck there. What you do you do? You want to alert your crew, but they probably won't believe the passenger, right? They're in their fortress, peeking with suspicion through a peep hole. So you give him a password. What's the alternative?

So, before you convince yourself that your thousands of hours set you apart from regular folks (or the "regional guys"), look at the situation. It could happen that one day you will make an a$$ of yourself despite your experience. Has happened before, amigo.


So, you have had time to think about this....and you still think they still made good decisions? Ok.

I thought the FO was right to not let the pax in, and to notify ATC. In my opinion there was no reason to hang out in flight once he had reason to suspect passenger and the Captain not returning to flight deck. Land the plane and sort out what happened in the back after.

The Captain made mistakes (in my view) by
1.)not identifying passenger with better English skills
2.)having pax pound on cockpit door vs. calling on interphone
3.)not exhausting all options before giving up-ie busting down door.
4.) giving up password under any circumstances.

How did he not know that the pax was responsible for jamming door?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom