Cat 2 in an RJ behind a heavy?

[inthegoo]

Your thoughts?

 

[Max Q]

Has anybody died?

-Brett

 

[Oakum_Boy]

Or how about a Cat I behind a heavy?

 

[Dubya]

Or how about a Cat I behind a heavy?

Why are you doing Cat I and II approaches behind Rosie O'Donnell?

W

 

[737 Pylt]

Why are you doing Cat I and II approaches behind Rosie O'Donnell?

W

I don't care who you are.....That's funny!:laugh:

737

 

[CFI2766]

Your thoughts?

Come on, this is a stewardess joke, right?

 

[Stifler's Mom]

Your thoughts?

Fly 1 dot high. That should keep you safe.

 

[www.]

Cat 2 in an RJ behind a heavy? Your thoughts?

PTT switch broken, your thoughts?
Nav light inop, your thoughts?
Lav doesn't have blue juice, your thoughts?
etc, etc, etc....

Just fly the airplane. Are you not a Captain?

 

[aerobato]

Fly 1 dot high. That should keep you safe.

Sarcasm I hope.

 

[Stifler's Mom]

Sarcasm I hope.

Yes, couldn't come up with a more ridiculous answer.

 

[crjdxr]

Why are you doing Cat I and II approaches behind Rosie O'Donnell?

W

I didn't think Rosie allowed those types of approaches.

 

[XPOO]

Are you not a Captain?

Unfortunately.

 

[Texx]

Unfortunately.

Poking at your Skywest pilots again?

 

[XPOO]

Poking at your Skywest pilots again?

Just like the rest of the pilots poking at their fellow pilot who started the thread. Just keeping the Status Quo.

 

[Simon Says]

Why are you doing Cat I and II approaches behind Rosie O'Donnell?

W

That is the only way to approach Rosie from behind....in the dark, and blindfolded!!

Preferably she is bagged too!

 

[Bako Cap]

Awwww crap.... thanks for the visual. It's like having an annoying song in my head.................

AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Shoot me!!!!!

 

[inthegoo]

Just as I suspected, no intelligence round these parts

 

[Morning Wood]

Just as I suspected, no intelligence round these parts

Maybe you should just tell everyone what you think is okay or not okay about it then.

 

[inthegoo]

Maybe you should just tell everyone what you think is okay or not okay about it then.

I asked for input, I thought it was an area for discussion, but if folks (as usual) just want to make foolish comments then I will talk about it alone with my circle.

I mean what is the purpose of this board?

(I already know the answer)

 

[labbats]

If it's Cat 2 then you're already given proper spacing unlike a visual approach.

 

[WalterSobchak]

I mean what is the purpose of this board?

(I already know the answer)

Then, rhetorical or not, why did you pose the question?

 

[XPOO]

His circle includes skypine69 and PBRstreetgang. Since they were all hired around the same time. Anyways, I would probably also want a second opinion if that were my circle.

 

[CFI2766]

I heard of an ATR stewardess going #2 on a certain ATR captain in Hilton Head, however...


anyone else hear this story?

 

[John Pennekamp]

I heard of an ATR stewardess going #2 on a certain ATR captain in Hilton Head, however...


anyone else hear this story?

That sounds like a TRAINWRECK.

 

[Cpt Oveur]

That would be in MYR and they did it to each other. Nothing like a good ole' CLE steamer on an overnight, I guess? Yeah, trainwreck.

 

[John Pennekamp]

That would be in MYR and they did it to each other. Nothing like a good ole' CLE steamer on an overnight, I guess? Yeah, trainwreck.

No, according to her, the hot carl was HHH.

 

[Cpt Oveur]

oh really? nicer hotel.

 

[say again]

Just as I suspected, no intelligence round these parts

Including yourself!!:beer:

But yes, they do give separation.

 

[Cpt Oveur]

in answer to the question though, there is nothing that states increased same runway seperation in a cat II landing vs cat I. At 3-10-3, same runway seperation in 7110.65, which is the ATC bible, you can see the criteria it states. Here is a link:
http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/ATC/Chp3/atc0310.html

 

[inthegoo]

Capt over & others,

I am talkin about a cat 2 ILS not catagory 2 of size