414Flyer
Down with Chemtrails!
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2002
- Posts
- 4,948
Sticky said:I'd tell that airline recruiter to go screw himself. Why would a pilot looking to secure his and/or his families future financially be a "step" backwards? That is a prefect example of whats wrong with the airline career path.
My thoughts exactly. I posted a message on here about a month ago, in another thread, that people need to live life for themselves and their familes, and not plan their life around what an airline interviewer might think.
Some people are so caught up in what is a better job, a lateral job, and what is moving backwards, that they forget about the importance of quality of life and a family.
There is a lot to be said for having a job in your hometown, that pays decent, gives you a life with your family, and where you can afford to buy at least some kind of house.
I think QOL, stability, and living where you want, are equally valid, if not more valid, reasons to take a job, besides just airplane size. So what if it is a smaller plane, or equal size. People with normal jobs do not fixate on the size of their office and desk. They think about thinks like pay, benefits, stability, location and family life. And if more people in aviation would consider these things, rather than being in some misguided race for a bigger plane, well aviation might just change.
If some airline interviewer or other pilot looked negatively at you for choosing a job that gave you more time with your family and an actual life at home, well its obvious who has priorities straight, and its not them.
No pilot on their death bed is wishing their had only flown a bigger size plane, but I am sure many thousands had wished they had spent more time with their families.