enuffalready
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Posts
- 607
Question... if as Jerry says is true and the 50's are no longer profitable, and skywest/asa is/are limited on 70/90's then why aren't they beating down the door of canadair to swap out 50's for Q's? We all know canadair is fully subsidized by the canadian government and has the luxury of operating at a loss into perpetuity. Why not trade unprofitiable 50's for 400's or tell them to start making 50 seat turbo props again? The canadians get jobs building those things and we get profitable aircraft?
or why we didnt get a boatload of ATR 500's.
or why we didnt get a boatload of ATR 500's.