From weekly CAL MEC update:
NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE UPDATE
Last week, in conjunction with our Subject Matter Expert from Guam, we worked most of the week finalizing and presenting the Guam requirements for the JCBA.***** We would like to express our thanks to the Guam pilots for their input, and their SME for traveling to Denver to assist us with this process.***** We understand that it required a good deal of hard work, travel and time away from home.***** In addition to Guam, last week we passed to management a counterproposal to their last proposal on Moving.
This week, the JNC spent the better part of its time with the Flight Instructor representatives from both CAL and UAL to draft the proposal for Section 23 – Instructors, of the new JCBA.***** Also this week the JNC received counterproposals on Section 4 - Expenses and Section 11- Vacation from management.***** Although it is still early in negotiations, the JNC was disappointed with the Company’s Vacation counterproposal. While management’s proposals on previous sections of the JCBA have been consistent with their stated desire to reach relatively prompt agreement, their vacation proposal falls well short of that goal.***** We hope that the Company is not reverting to concessionary type negotiating of days past to pay for the merger of the future.
While the Transition and Process Agreement makes mention of reaching a JCBA by October 12, 2010 (Section 2, paragraph K), this is not a deadline. Instead, it is a trigger that permits the parties to apply to the NMB for mediation (unless the parties agree not to).********** While the goal of the JNC is to complete the JCBA in relatively quick fashion, it will not accept any substandard or concessionary agreement for the purpose of expediency.