Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

CAL giving up on EWR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter densoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 23

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Yes, but don't forget by years end 2009, CAL will have parked all its old gen 737-300. And will continue to park additional 737-500 reducing its total airframe count of 341 further.

CAL will have 300 airframes by 2010. Pretty darn close to the regional count which will further increase with that wonderful CAL Scope.

You just got scooped.

Are you guessing or making this up as you go? Since you seem to have the insider knowledge of how far the and how many Q400's CAL will have, tell us o' wise one, what are those two numbers?

Sorry, what, huh, can't hear ya? Well, let me answer for you? CAL's fleet plan is for 337 aircraft by YE2009 and 347 by YE2010. The regional fleet count decreases by 1 airframe and 6 Q400's are added. Dumb ass. Go count your nuts. You might have better luck with that math.
 
CAL management assigns 737's as transcon airframes. It uses 757 for Atlantic crossings against the wind.

Would CAL stuff passengers into a Q 600 with 120 seats and fly it across the country? CAL already does that exact thing whether the passengers like it or not. And then they brag about what a great customer service they provide.

Does CAL scope prevent a 120 seat transon turboprop from flying the brand? NO!

All CAL has to do is tell the advertisers its like riding in a Prius.

The sincerest form of flattery is imitation...........look it up. Look tree hugger; just because you drive a refrigerator box on wheels does not mean that CAL will have a Q400 go further than PWM. Spill this drivel on people that believe you; go back to the yahoo boards.
 
CAL management assigns 737's as transcon airframes. It uses 757 for Atlantic crossings against the wind.

Would CAL stuff passengers into a Q 600 with 120 seats and fly it across the country? CAL already does that exact thing whether the passengers like it or not. And then they brag about what a great customer service they provide.

Does CAL scope prevent a 120 seat transon turboprop from flying the brand? NO!

All CAL has to do is tell the advertisers its like riding in a Prius.

I will not argue with you that we have more than our share of boot lickers. We have guys that will do anything for MGT. especially if it involves harming another pilot.
Do you really think they will buy turbo props to do trans cons? I guess the constellations did it in the 50's but do you think people will sit that long in an airplane?
 
I quoted my source as Airlinepilot.com for numbers. Check the past quotes copies from others of my post!

You quoted yours as the 8K report. You have the more accurate info.

But 337 mainline to 266 regional means 79% of CAL's airframe are not being flown by CAL pilots. Everyone from CAL sounds like management especially when you discuss ASM verse airframes. Two pilots fly the same airframe that has 70/90 or whatever number of seats.

The scope issue is about protecting and increasing jobs at the mainline verse being shipped off to unsafe, non-standard, airlines who are flying on CAL tickets. JOBS have been lost at CAL since 1995 without limit. If a 70 seat airframe would do a transcon CAL would replace a CAL pilot today.

CAL pilots win arguments by looking at the leaves instead of the forest that is getting ready to go up in flames around them.

79%

That number is much higher than DALs 50%. 5% is significant.
 
Last edited:
So now share another number which is not going to be in the 8k.

How many CAL pilots are currently on the list who were over age 60 on Dec. 13, 2007?

I understand it is over 200+.

One is against the law. But the CAL pilots are so complacent nothing will be done as nothing has been done.

A CAL pilot never has an issue with safety, comfort, or schedule much less union matters.
 
How many pilots have died inflight during a CAL flight recently?

I understand at least two captains. How many others did not get reported?
 
What is the lowest fuel level a 37, 57, 67, 777 landed?

What is the penalty for ordering enough gas at CAL or getting the proper alternate?
 
nice math but that is 44 percent not 79

I am sure 200 guys must have died in flight we just keep it out of the press

Lowest fuel level FOD is different for every day based on weather and I have never seen any one challenged on adding gas, keep stirring the pot pocono wanabee, at least pocono was funny, I kind of mis his/her posts
 
Where the ******************** do these corksuckers get off cutting that many postions when EVERY********************ING flight is oversold enough to fill 2 more airplanes. Somone needs to smash these ********************bags in the jaw with a pipe wrench and leave them with no medical attention. IM ********************ING SICK OF THIS BULL********************!!!!!!!!

There are medications available. Relax.

Why is it so many people equate "full flights" and "oversold" to mean "profitable"?
 
So now share another number which is not going to be in the 8k.

How many CAL pilots are currently on the list who were over age 60 on Dec. 13, 2007?

I understand it is over 200+.

One is against the law. But the CAL pilots are so complacent nothing will be done as nothing has been done.

A CAL pilot never has an issue with safety, comfort, or schedule much less union matters.
The number is 13.
 
So now share another number which is not going to be in the 8k.

How many CAL pilots are currently on the list who were over age 60 on Dec. 13, 2007?

I understand it is over 200+.

One is against the law. But the CAL pilots are so complacent nothing will be done as nothing has been done.

A CAL pilot never has an issue with safety, comfort, or schedule much less union matters.

Their are currently 13 over 60 guys still on the list that were over 60 when 65 past. ALPA has sued and we are waiting on the FAA interpretation.

As for Scope Delta has over 50% of its domestic ASM's flown by connection carriers where CAL's is at around 35-40%.

We have a lot of work to do but CAL is not alone in what it wrong with our profession.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top